[cisco-voip] Video Conferencing ? CM 4.1(3)

Scott Voll svoll.voip at gmail.com
Wed Jan 30 14:06:17 EST 2008


Most outside world stuff it's a lot easier to run H323 with Gatekeepers.  we
have a state wide network that we do all our VC over IP.  if it's out of
state we use our Regional Hub to bridge the IP / ISDN.  Depending on weather
you want to do three way or better conferencing and don't have a service
provider that can you it for you.... you may look at the cuvc or radvision
or there are a couple others I'm forgetting right now.  Tandbergs do have a
three way bridge build in if you want to use that.

Scott

On Jan 30, 2008 7:30 AM, Robert Kulagowski <rkulagow at gmail.com> wrote:

> Matthew Saskin wrote:
> > Ditto that for the Polycom's.  If I recall correctly, the polycom H.323
> > load also has the ability for it to route outbound calls via the
> > CallManager, so that a gatekeeper isn't necessary.
> >
> > For the easiest integration with either vendor, just order the endpoint
> > with the SCCP load on it.  From there, they have a plugin you run on the
> > CallManager to load the new device type, then when you go to add a phone
> > you'll have a new phone type of Tandberg Video Endpoint (for example).
>
> How complicated does it get once you need to talk to the outside world
> though?  If I have a SCCP endpoint connected via ethernet and haven't
> pulled a PRI to the endpoint, then I'm assuming that this is where
> devices like the CUVC 3545 comes into play?  In CM, is it just
> configured as a MGCP gateway?
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080130/020513b6/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list