[cisco-voip] Emergency Response Location Mapping

[Scott Voll]

a year or so ago I installed for one of my districts and installed CER. so
I'm aware of the cost (which seem pretty resonable, being cisco) and the
reaccuring cost is just the PS-ALI cost (above smartnet) I'm thinking the
red sky and others have a higher out of pocket cost.

we are almost entirely DID to ever phone so I'm not apposed to changing the
last 20 phones to DID if that would fix my  E911 issues with people moving
phones from one location to another.

But I have a question, what is 911 going to think when they get an out of
area number at the 911 center?  are they just going to forward it to the
other 911 center even though that person is in there 911 foot print?

Scott

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Jason Aarons (US) <
jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:

>  If you are not using DIDs but Extensions and 911 calls back what will
> they get?
>
>
>
> Also some companies have coordinated onsite response, eg security guard
> gets a telephone or email alert and tries to give you CPR, etc.
>
>
>
> Personally most companies don't realize the costs around deploying
> Emergency Responder, it's a love/hate for me.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Friday, July 18, 2008 3:23 PM
> *To:* Tim Smith
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Emergency Response Location Mapping
>
>
>
> This is exactly what I was referring to.  so with this feature is there
> really a reason to front a CER installation?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Tim Smith <tim.smith.wa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You can use Device Mobility from 4.2 and up.
>
> It allows you to assign config parameters based on the physical location -
> determined by the IP address...
>
>
>
> So if you move a hard phone or soft phone from location A to location B it
> can dynamically configure itself with the new settings.
>
> In particular a CSS on the device, that includes the correct routing and
> number translation if required for a 911 call... i.e. out the local gateway.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 7/17/08, *Scott Voll* <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I really don't know.  But for some reason I think someone said something
> about using locations in CM 6.x for some of this.  I would start looking
> there.  if you are using pre 6.x I don't think there is a really good way.
> Did someone take a phone and move it to a new location?  That;s the problem
> I'm having currently.
>
>
>
> I'm looking for the best solution for E911 currently and plan to make a
> decision at CIPTUG this year.
>
>
>
> if the user was just EM or something like that.... then it's all based on
> Phone + line CSS and shouldn't otherwise be an issue.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> **users --> people you don't want to do something and they do, want them to
> do something and they don't :-s
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Leslie Meade <lmeade at signal.ca> wrote:
>
>   I have been tasked to find out how to do this without going down the
> Emergency Responder server route. Police went to the wrong location L
>
>
>
> I overheard at one stage it is do able by writing configs on the routers
> and switches.
>
> Can any one point me in the correct direction.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080718/e13ed412/attachment-0001.html>