[cisco-voip] Emergency Response Location Mapping

[Tim Smith]

I'd say send a specific DID that 911 can call back...

depends on the size of the office, in very small branch, it could be a hunt
group that rings everyone, or it could be the switchboard?

Cheers,

Tim.


On 7/18/08, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:
>
>  If you are not using DIDs but Extensions and 911 calls back what will
> they get?
>
>
>
> Also some companies have coordinated onsite response, eg security guard
> gets a telephone or email alert and tries to give you CPR, etc.
>
>
>
> Personally most companies don't realize the costs around deploying
> Emergency Responder, it's a love/hate for me.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Friday, July 18, 2008 3:23 PM
> *To:* Tim Smith
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Emergency Response Location Mapping
>
>
>
> This is exactly what I was referring to.  so with this feature is there
> really a reason to front a CER installation?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Tim Smith <tim.smith.wa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You can use Device Mobility from 4.2 and up.
>
> It allows you to assign config parameters based on the physical location -
> determined by the IP address...
>
>
>
> So if you move a hard phone or soft phone from location A to location B it
> can dynamically configure itself with the new settings.
>
> In particular a CSS on the device, that includes the correct routing and
> number translation if required for a 911 call... i.e. out the local gateway.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 7/17/08, *Scott Voll* <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I really don't know.  But for some reason I think someone said something
> about using locations in CM 6.x for some of this.  I would start looking
> there.  if you are using pre 6.x I don't think there is a really good way.
> Did someone take a phone and move it to a new location?  That;s the problem
> I'm having currently.
>
>
>
> I'm looking for the best solution for E911 currently and plan to make a
> decision at CIPTUG this year.
>
>
>
> if the user was just EM or something like that.... then it's all based on
> Phone + line CSS and shouldn't otherwise be an issue.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> **users --> people you don't want to do something and they do, want them to
> do something and they don't :-s
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Leslie Meade <lmeade at signal.ca> wrote:
>
>   I have been tasked to find out how to do this without going down the
> Emergency Responder server route. Police went to the wrong location L
>
>
>
> I overheard at one stage it is do able by writing configs on the routers
> and switches.
>
> Can any one point me in the correct direction.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080722/4d62ac71/attachment.html>