[cisco-voip] simple SRST question

[Kevin Dunn]

Scott

you can run your gateways with H323 and never input their ports in Call
Manager.  MGCP is easier I think, but H323 gives you more control.

So add a pots dial-peer and let it go, the gateway will see the local
dial-peer even in fallback mode... easy as PIE

Kevin


On 3/27/08, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> perfect.  that's what I wanted to hear.  I just didn't know if CM need to
> know anything about the ports or not.
>
> THANKS
>
> Scott
>
>
>  On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> > If you are not going to use them in CM why add them at all?  Simply
> > configure them to be used in pots dial-peers and the SRST router should have
> > no problem using them.
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> >   On Mar 27, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
> > I've never needed to do this, but I'm just checking my thoughts.
> >
> > I have a bunch of Remote sites that use the hq location for dial tone
> > (PRIs).  But in setting up SRST I have some FXO ports at the remote sites.
> >
> > I'm not going to setup the FXO's in CM but want to use then in SRST
> > mode.  is that a problem?  I just add the service mgcpapp command to the
> > dial peer and I should be fine right?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Scott
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080327/1b79e7e2/attachment.html