[cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 61, Issue 33

Wed Nov 5 14:56:44 EST 2008

Ryan,

I tested this srst call preserve but the call goes to voicemail and
doesn't hit the 4XXX route pattern. Seems like I'm missing something
else?

James Jung
Senior Systems Support Specialist,  IPST
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, 6 November 2008 4:21 a.m.
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 61, Issue 33

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: srst dial-plan preserve from HQ to BR !!! (Ryan Ratliff)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:21:15 -0500
From: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] srst dial-plan preserve from HQ to BR !!!
To: "'Djokic Sinisa'" <sdjokic at mds.rs>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <009201c93f5a$2503eab0$6fdd6640 at amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

In 4.x did you use CFNA to get the call to hit the route pattern or just
use
it as a less-specific match?  Even in 4.x when a DN is unregistered it
still
stays in DA, which should mean it's always matched, and if there is an
intercept for the DN the call will route using that intercept.

-Ryan 

  _____  

From: Djokic Sinisa [mailto:sdjokic at mds.rs] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:17 AM
To: 'Ryan Ratliff'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] srst dial-plan preserve from HQ to BR !!!

thanx ryan..

these are not good news for 6.1 users but they are news..

:-)..

btw..

it definetely works in 4.X..

regards..

Sinisa Djokic 

System Engineer
CCNP,CCDA,CQS-CWLDS,CS-CIPTDS,CS-CIPCCES Cisco Certified

MDS Informaticki inzenjering
Bul. Arsenija Carnojevica 170
11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia
Tel: +381 11 2015 200, 2015 273
Fax: +381 11 3194 954
www.mds.rs
sdjokic at mds.rs

  _____  

From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:00 PM
To: 'Djokic Sinisa'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] srst dial-plan preserve from HQ to BR !!!

In 7.x you can use local route groups to work around this issue but
until
then you are correct that all the calls to the site in SRST will be
routed
via a single route pattern.    Honestly this should not have worked in
4.x
either.

-Ryan 

  _____  

From: Djokic Sinisa [mailto:sdjokic at mds.rs] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 9:56 AM
To: 'Ryan Ratliff'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] srst dial-plan preserve from HQ to BR !!!

the point is that call forward unregistered in this scenario would
require
all remote offices to use WAN resources and central office gateways ( or
any
other resources to make those calls )..

which isn't optimized solution..

thanx..

regards..

Sinisa Djokic 

System Engineer
CCNP,CCDA,CQS-CWLDS,CS-CIPTDS,CS-CIPCCES Cisco Certified

MDS Informaticki inzenjering
Bul. Arsenija Carnojevica 170
11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia
Tel: +381 11 2015 200, 2015 273
Fax: +381 11 3194 954
www.mds.rs
sdjokic at mds.rs

  _____  

From: Djokic Sinisa [mailto:sdjokic at mds.rs] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:40 PM
To: 'Ryan Ratliff'; 'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] srst dial-plan preserve from HQ to BR !!!

hi..

but in that case if we choose for example HQ calling search space to
catch
that DID number or any other it would make sense for HQ office..

but if another branch office which is registred to CUCM and it's not in
SRST
wants to make call to BR which is in SRST, it wouldn't use appropriate
CSS..

so it wouldn't choose it's local gateway etc..

regards..

Sinisa Djokic 

System Engineer
CCNP,CCDA,CQS-CWLDS,CS-CIPTDS,CS-CIPCCES Cisco Certified

MDS Informaticki inzenjering
Bul. Arsenija Carnojevica 170
11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia
Tel: +381 11 2015 200, 2015 273
Fax: +381 11 3194 954
www.mds.rs
sdjokic at mds.rs

  _____  

From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 3:34 PM
To: 'Djokic Sinisa'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] srst dial-plan preserve from HQ to BR !!!

What about just setting the CFUR (call forward unregistered) value for
your
phones to their DID?  

-Ryan 

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Djokic Sinisa
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 9:26 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] srst dial-plan preserve from HQ to BR !!!

hi group..

well, i suppose somebody would say RTFM, but maybe somebody has a quick
fix
for this one..

:-)..

in CCM4.X we provided preservation of 4-digit dialing between extension
in
HQ office and extension in BR office in the case of WAN failurure by
creating route pattern with for example 4XXX and pointing out to the
route
list which transforms 4XXX into the full PSTN number of the extesnion in
the
BR office..

when WAN goes down, SRST in BR is active,  CCM doesn't see BR phone
registred and it matches 4XXX route pattern..so the 4 digit dialing in
SRST
works ( HQ to BR )..

in 6.X it doesn't seem to work..so what's the solution for 6.X ( maybe
5.X )
to provide that functionality..

obviosly, dial architecture changed in this case also..

any hints?..

thanx..

reagards..

Sinisa Djokic 

System Engineer
CCNP,CCDA,CQS-CWLDS,CS-CIPTDS,CS-CIPCCES Cisco Certified

MDS Informaticki inzenjering
Bul. Arsenija Carnojevica 170
11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia
Tel: +381 11 2015 200, 2015 273
Fax: +381 11 3194 954
www.mds.rs
sdjokic at mds.rs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081105/7806b
83c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 3486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081105/7806b
83c/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 3497 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081105/7806b
83c/attachment-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 3486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081105/7806b
83c/attachment-0002.gif>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 61, Issue 33
******************************************