[cisco-voip] Alternative to a External Phone Number Mask

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

route patterns, route groups and gateways all have precedence over a phones external calling mask. (maybe not route groups) 

you'd have to create a special group of those via CCS to mask the external calling mask of those emergency phones. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew J. Hughes" <mattjhughes at gmail.com> 
To: "cisco-voip at puck-nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2008 2:08:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Alternative to a External Phone Number Mask 


Most phones on our network have DIDs instead of extensions but for some emergency phones I started to use extensions. I want to give all these phones one external number mask, however I dont want the external Number mask to appear on the phone, instead I want its local extension. Can I use something else besides External Mask? Translation pattern mayhaps? 

Matt 

_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081001/2d950f82/attachment.html>