[cisco-voip] Cisco 7960 VS 7961 VS 7962

[Ryan West]

7960, no peer file sharing, horrible for remote SRST deployments of 50+ phones, might take all night / all day to get the phones upgraded.  No intercom either, other than that, they have proven to be fairly reliable.

-ryan

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:24 AM
To: Tim Smith
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7960 VS 7961 VS 7962

Also the original 7914 sidecar is now EOS and the new 7915 and 7916 replacements only work with the 7962 and 7965 phones!

-Adam
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Tim Smith <thsglobal at gmail.com<mailto:thsglobal at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Key points just off the top of my head... generations in order as listed.. features are cumulative

7960 - First gen... solid line buttons.. pretty bad resolution.. no 802.3af standard PoE
7961 - LED's for line buttons, 802.3af PoE
7962 - iLBC - low bit rate internet codec support, g722
7965 - Colour screen

Cheers,

Tim.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Syed Khalid Ali <syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com<mailto:syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com>> wrote:
I was checking the datasheet of these phones. Everything seems to be
same for all three expcept the screen enhancements.
Can any one point out the some major differences b/w these phones?
Also what about the generations, I mean which one came first  second
and third?
--
Thanks,
Syed Khalid Ali
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081029/f706b5c9/attachment.html>