[cisco-voip] Upgrading from 4.x to 6.x (Leetun, Rob)
Robert Knapp
robert.knapp at spanlink.com
Thu Oct 30 17:01:49 EDT 2008
I would try to use the new tool for the Unity Upgrade. I think its called CORBA. You can jump versions with it 4 to 5 e.g. Instead of DiRT to back up 4 reinstall 4 and upgrade to 5.
Thanks,
Robert Knapp
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:54 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 60, Issue 244
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Upgrading from 4.x to 6.x (Leetun, Rob)
2. Re: Upgrading from 4.x to 6.x (Chris Ward)
3. Re: CSCsb57445 Can't use DPA 7630 /Octel withCallManager
5x/6x (Ryan Ratliff)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:48:55 -0600
From: "Leetun, Rob" <rleetun at bouldercounty.org>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrading from 4.x to 6.x
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<963CE94787005149A52C17F33A028E120DA29E75 at EVS1B.boco.co.boulder.co.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
We will be upgrading from 4.x to 6.x in a few weeks. Are there any
things that I should be mindful of before the upgrade and during the
upgrade? And, can I use an MSI to push the IPCC 5.x Agent installs to
the PC? And, last question, can I use DIRT to send the backup of the
old Unity to a new Unity box, or can I just copy the MBX file and paste
it into the new Unity box?
Thanks for the insight.
Robert Leetun
Network Engineer
Boulder County Information Technology
2025 14th Street
Boulder, CO 80302
303 441-3866 (W)
303 441-3983 (F)
rleetun at bouldercounty.org <mailto:arees at bouldercounty.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081030/97ed9c31/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:53:40 -0400
From: Chris Ward <chrward at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrading from 4.x to 6.x
To: "Leetun, Rob" <rleetun at bouldercounty.org>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <C52F9714.BB89%chrward at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
For CUCM, run the DMA backup as soon as possible to weed out any errors now.
Nothing worse than waiting until the night of or before the upgrade to find
out you need TAC to help resolve some DMA backup errors.
The earlier you run it the better. That?s not to say you need to do a change
freeze (although it might be best). Just run the DMA back as a test to weed
out any obvious problems, then you can also run it again the night of the
upgrade to get the most recent data.
My $0.02
Chris Ward
From: "Leetun, Rob" <rleetun at bouldercounty.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:48:55 -0600
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrading from 4.x to 6.x
Hi,
We will be upgrading from 4.x to 6.x in a few weeks. Are there any things
that I should be mindful of before the upgrade and during the upgrade? And,
can I use an MSI to push the IPCC 5.x Agent installs to the PC? And, last
question, can I use DIRT to send the backup of the old Unity to a new Unity
box, or can I just copy the MBX file and paste it into the new Unity box?
Thanks for the insight.
Robert Leetun
Network Engineer
Boulder County Information Technology
2025 14th Street
Boulder, CO 80302
303 441-3866 (W)
303 441-3983 (F)
rleetun at bouldercounty.org <mailto:arees at bouldercounty.org>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081030/52c44c43/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:54:05 -0400
From: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CSCsb57445 Can't use DPA 7630 /Octel
withCallManager 5x/6x
To: "'Jason Aarons \(US\)'" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>, "Chris Ward
\(chrward\)" <chrward at cisco.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <013901c93ad1$a5c2c230$abdd6640 at amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Fixed via DPA load 1.3(1)ES8.
-Ryan
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:45 PM
To: Chris Ward; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CSCsb57445 Can't use DPA 7630 /Octel
withCallManager 5x/6x
I attached the RSS notice, but is CSCsg21994
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fet
chBugDetails&bugId=CSCsg21994
From: Chris Ward [mailto:chrward at cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:40 PM
To: Jason Aarons (US); cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CSCsb57445 Can't use DPA 7630 /Octel with
CallManager 5x/6x
Jason,
You may have copied the wrong bug. This one has to do with a calledparty
field in a sccp message that is resolved in 5.0.1.
Can you check the bug ID and post back?
Chris Ward
_____
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:32:05 -0400
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CSCsb57445 Can't use DPA 7630 /Octel with CallManager
5x/6x
Do I understand this correctly, that CallManager 4x deployments with a DPA
can't upgrade to 5x/6x at this time? Is a hotfix available for 6x? Will
the DMA or upgrade assistant warn this upgrade will have issues?
DPA sends CalledPartyNumber instead of OriginalCalledPartyNumber to VM
Symptom:
Calls routed to voicemail via DPA will show up in Octel destined to the
wrong voicemailbox.
This can result in the caller being prompted to login or simply getting the
default greeting.
Conditions:
DPA voicemail integration with CM 4.2(1) or later (including CM 5.0).
Workaround:
None
Further Problem Description:
In previous versions of CallManager the SCCP CallInfo message sent to a
phone had the originalCalledParty and calledPartyNumbers with the same value
(that of the originalCalledParty number). This was done to be backwards
compatible with old voicemail products such as UOne. Since this message is
only used to present display information to the SCCP device it did not
impact the routing of calls.
CSCsb57445 was filed to fix this issue and get the calledPartyNumber to
display the correct value. This fix had the side-effect of causing the wrong
number to be sent by the DPA as the called party number.
_____
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you.
_____
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_____
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081030/ed5c378a/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 60, Issue 244
*******************************************
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list