[cisco-voip] Disaster recovery
Ryan West
rwest at zyedge.com
Mon Sep 22 14:40:54 EDT 2008
If overlap is the concern, do policy nat between sites and use the
same addresses.
Sent from a shiny magical device with predictive typing.
On Sep 22, 2008, at 2:35 PM, "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> we are planing for Disaster (full MDF Fire) we have extra servers
> that can take over for our current servers (CM 6.1 / Unity / UCCx)
> I would like to have them cold fail over (OS and application pre
> installed, and updated on a regular basis). Is it going to be a
> problem if they have different IP addresses? we would like to have
> them powered on but it will require a different IP address because
> they will be off site in a different location. my thought is that I
> will backup to this offsite location and in the case of a fire /
> disaster we would restore the backup(s) and swing over some lines
> over and get our phones / call centers back up and running if fairly
> short order. is the IP address issue going to be any kind of issue
> for CM 6.1.2, UCCx 5.0.2, and Unity 5.0.1?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list