[cisco-voip] 1760 as a IPIPGW (CUBE)
Tanner Ezell
tanner.ezell at gmail.com
Sun Apr 5 12:34:17 EDT 2009
That was my thought, I noticed it was not listed as compatible but some of the commands were available. Ill have to see about getting a 2610XM or so
------Original Message------
From: Nick Matthews
Sender: matthn at gmail.com
To: Tanner Ezell
Cc: VOIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 1760 as a IPIPGW (CUBE)
Sent: Apr 5, 2009 9:21 AM
You can accomplish something very close to CUBE, but no, it will not
be a CUBE. There isn't any IPIPGW code for the 1760.
The commands exist in non CUBE software packages, but there is a
slight variation in many of the corner case scenarios that makes it
work more like a SBC instead of a terminating gateway. The commands
'allow-connections h323-to-h323' and such have been around for
CUBE-like scenarios like routing calls between two CMEs to CUE
(SIP-H323). This behavior is different from actual IPIPGW
implementation.
As well, there were large improvements in CUBE in 12.4(20)T,
especially with SIP. If you're doing SIP at all 12.4(20)T is a good
place to start at, and since the 1760 is being phased out, 12.4(15)T
is the last release for that platform.
Short story - it's not a CUBE capable router, but you may get lucky
and have it work if you're dealing with the simple standard-case
situations (not supplementary services).
-nick
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Tanner Ezell <tanner.ezell at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been toying with a 1760, trying to get it to act as an IP to IP Gateway
> with limited success, calls come in as h323, but I never see any attempt to
> go out as SIP. I am beginning to wonder if the device is even capable.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list