[cisco-voip] VG224 issue

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

I third that opinion. I use SCCP and it was very easy to setup. I think SCCP debugs are also more helpful (I could be wrong there). 

That being said, we are using modem/fax passthrough and have downgraded our FAXes to 14.4/ECC off. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> 
To: "Paul" <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> 
Cc: "Scott Kee" <SKee at cmsstl.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 1:16:01 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 issue 

Oh, wow, it is MGCP... I didn't even see that... 

Yeah, ditto, go with SCCP. 

J 

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote: 
> 
> Personally, I'd ditch the MGCP and use Skinny for the VG224. I've had a lot more luck and flexibility using Skinny. Make sure you update the IOS on the VG. 
> 
> Paul 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ---- 
> From: Scott Kee <SKee at cmsstl.com> 
> To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 8:58:18 AM 
> Subject: [cisco-voip] VG224 issue 
> 
> 
> I have VG224 with CM 6.1 and using MGCP. I have about 18 fax machines plugged into this Voice Gateway. 
> Sometime early March people started complaining that they weren't receiving faxes from outside. 
> They were hearing fast busy signal when outside people send faxes to the fax machines that were plugged into the VG 224. 
> I reloaded VG 224 and power recycled fax machines but it did not make any difference. 
> I called Cisco TAC and worked on the issue for about 20 hours but did not find any issues. 
> We RMA the router but it did not make any difference. We ended up removing the VG224 gateway from CM and recreated it. That seemed fixed the issues then. 
> 
> This afternoon, I am seeing exact same issues with VG 224. It was working fine till now. 
> I did not make any configuration changes on the VG224... 
> I am going to call Cisco tomorrow morning but I don't know Cisco is going to do this time? 
> Is this CM issue or VG? 
> 
> Does anyone experience this issue? 
> 
> Any help would really appreciated. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> _______________________________________________ 
> cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> 
_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090427/5debc860/attachment.html>