[cisco-voip] Cisco VG20x voice gateway interoperability (CM required?)

Nick Matthews matthnick at gmail.com
Thu Dec 3 23:08:25 EST 2009


Incorrect, partially.  If you're using VG202/204 with SCCP they
require a certain CUCM version.  I would like to say 7.1.2 and 6.1.3
offhand, but a quick google search on the data sheet will tell you the
details.  The CUCM has to recognize the 202/204 for SCCP as they use a
different port numbering.  If you're using MGCP/H323/SIP you're ok
with any version pretty much.

-nick

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Dale Shaw
<dale.shaw+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Nate. I figured that was the case, but the data sheet doesn't
> spell that out at all. I thought there might have been some
> proprietary voodoo going on, perhaps around licensing.
>
> cheers,
> Dale
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Nate VanMaren <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org> wrote:
>> There full IOS, so SIP/H.323/MGCP/SCCP.  No CM required.
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dale Shaw [dale.shaw+cisco-voip at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:58 PM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco VG20x voice gateway interoperability (CM    required?)
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Probably a bit of a newbie question but I'm hoping for a quick response --
>>
>> Do the Cisco VG200 series (202, 204, 224) devices _require_
>> CallManager in some form, or can they be used as generic ATAs with a
>> 3rd party SIP gateway?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list