[cisco-voip] UCCX - Presenting Caller ID / Name rather than CTI Route Point Number

Matthew Linsemier mlinsemier at apassurance.com
Fri Dec 18 13:35:36 EST 2009


This is what I figured.  I was wondering if there was any way to preserve
the calling number in CallManager through the trigger lines and CTI pool.  I
wasn¹t sure if numbers were considered forwarded or not, and if you played
around with any of the forwarding settings, if you could get it to work.
>From the sounds of it, no.


On 12/18/09 11:51 AM, "Tanner Ezell" <tanner.ezell at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is not possible due to the way UCCX handles calls, in short:
> 
> Caller dials Trigger (CTI Route Point), UCCX is made aware of the call, finds
> an unused CTI Port and the caller is connected to that CTI Port. 
> 
> Now, until the caller is transferred to an agent, all handling of the Caller
> (get digits, play media, etc) is done via this CTI Port. Remember that CTI
> Ports act as software phones (akin to CIPC); For all intents and purposes, the
> Caller is talking to Softphone with extension 53xx.
> 
> When an agent becomes available, the CTI Port rings to the agent. At this
> point is where you see your CTI Ports (53xx) ringing the Agent phone, the
> reason being is that the call is still being controlled by UCCX via the CTI
> Port. Until the caller is released from the CTI Port and transferred to the
> Agent (agent picks up), UCCX will keep control of the call.
> 
> Now in theory, you might be able to accomplish what you're seeking by doing
> something like using the connect step to get the AgentID UCCX has found for
> you and doing a cold transfer to that person terminating the connection to the
> CTI Port. Again, I've never actually tried this so I can't say for certain it
> will work; Additionally it comes at a risk to your caller, should the agent
> not answer (RONA) the call will be dropped out of queue and terminated (since
> you terminated the CTI Port connecting the caller to UCCX)
> 
> Even if that is possible, I don't recommend it (the only acceptable time to
> implement such a thing would be in call centre environments that utilize auto
> answer).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tanner Ezell 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Matthew Linsemier
> <mlinsemier at apassurance.com> wrote:
>> I do this but it still doesn¹t show up until the agent answers the call...
>> Maybe I am handling it wrong so I will look into this again.
>> 
>> However, what I would like to do also is preserve the original caller on the
>> phones as well.  Right now if I call our helpdesk, the agent is presented
>> with a call from the CTI route point (53xx) number not the original caller.
>>  Again, Im not sure if this is possible but I would like to have something
>> like this:
>> 
>>  Matt (2000) calls helpdesk trigger (6767) --> CTI Pool (number 5300-5324)
>> --> Agent Phone (Displays ³Matt, 2000² before they pick it up)
>> 
>> Right now all the agent sees is a CTI Pool number (5300-5324).
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/18/09 9:55 AM, "Mike Olivere" <mikeeo at msn.com <http://mikeeo@msn.com> >
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I would use Get Call Contact info step and throw ³calling number² into a
>>> variable and then display it on the CAD using enterprise data.
>>>  
>>> UCCX as far as I know can¹t display name yet.
>>>  
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>> <http://cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net>
>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Linsemier
>>> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 8:53 AM
>>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <http://cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX - Presenting Caller ID / Name rather than CTI
>>> Route Point Number
>>>  
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I am wondering if anyone knows if it is possible within a UCCX script to
>>> present an agent with the originating Caller ID of the Caller rather than
>>> the CTI route point ³before² they answer the call (as it is ringing).  For
>>> some reason I have had issues getting this to work.  We are current on UCCX
>>> 7.0(2).  If anyone can point me where to look, if it is possible, I would
>>> appreciate it!
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Matt 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>>> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected
>>> by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the use of the
>>> addressee identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
>>> disclosure, copying or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED.
>>> Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything
>>> else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature
>>> unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. If
>>> you have received this communication in error, please immediately contact me
>>> and delete this communication from your computer. Thank you.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected
>> by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the use of the
>> addressee identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
>> disclosure, copying or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED.
>> Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything
>> else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless
>> a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately contact me and
>> delete this communication from your computer. Thank you.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> 
> 
> 


CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may
be protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended
solely for the use of the addressee identified above. If you
are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying
or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither
this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor
anything else in this message is intended to constitute an
electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete
this communication from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091218/bb147ed7/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list