[cisco-voip] Looking for opinions on the Cisco Wireless IP Endpoints

Chris Ward chrward at cisco.com
Wed Feb 11 15:02:55 EST 2009


The 7921s and 7925s are MUCH improved from the old days of the 7920s. The
batteries have decent longevity (4-5 days depending on use) and they support
802.11a/b/g over the 7920¹s b-only.

I use a 7921 occasionally when I am away from my desk and haven¹t had any
issues with it.

Chris Ward 


From: Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:59:58 -0500
To: Micah Bennett <mbennett at als-xtn.com>
Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Looking for opinions on the Cisco Wireless IP
Endpoints

I have some of the 7920's used for paper weights. I'm told the newer models
are much better though.

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Micah Bennett <mbennett at als-xtn.com> wrote:
> Hello all
> 
> We have call manager 4.2(3).
> 
> We may be in the need for a wireless IP phone and I wanted to see what the
> opinions are from anyone that has used them?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Micah Bennett
> 
> Telecommunications Admin
> 
> Active Outdoors
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 



-- 
Ed Leatherman
Assistant Director, Voice Services
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090211/a3bd5619/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list