[cisco-voip] Is anyone using using a non-Cisco approved server forCUCM?
jliakos at csr.com.au
Wed Feb 18 20:45:14 EST 2009
Where I use to work we never bought Cisco MS Server's but instead only
the HP equivalent...
Never had a problem.
Yes like you said, much cheaper !
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Omori, Hiroshi
Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2009 12:37
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Is anyone using using a non-Cisco approved server
In these times of shrinking budgets, I was wondering if anyone is using
a non-Cisco approved server for the CUCM?
Cisco and HP created a part number, 470064-887, which is equivalent to
the MCS 7845H2. It's still available from HP but it looks like it has a
discontinued CPU(5140) and the RAID controller is a P400/256 instead of
I received a quote for a HP DL-380 G5 server that has a newer CPU and
RAID controller that is almost half the price of the Cisco "approved"
I'm pretty sure the CUCM would run fine, in fact we're running a 5
server cluster on HP DL-380 G5 servers using the E5345 CPU's in our test
lab but I wanted to see if anyone has encountered any problems.
UCLA - University of California, Los Angeles
Communications Technology Services
741 Charles Young Drive South
Building CSB1, 2nd floor
Los Angeles, Ca. 90095
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cisco-voip