[cisco-voip] Unity vs Uccx for regional office greeting

[Matthew Loraditch]

If that's all you are doing Unity will work fine for that. I don't see how it would raise any issues in and of itself, obviously if you need to go more complex in the future you might have to migrate the AA to UCCX, but that's just changing how you are routing the calls.


Matthew Loraditch
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593

Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com>
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Kee
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:15 PM
To: 'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity vs Uccx for regional office greeting

What is Pros and Cons if I use Unity as Auto Attendant for a  Regional Office?
I know UCCX has a lot more advanced features but what we are doing at the Regional office is simple Auto Attendant.

The Regional Office Auto Attendant will have
-9-5 Business hour greeting
-After business hour greeting
-Holiday greeting

If I use Unity Auto Attendant instead of UCCX, is it going to raise too many issues in the future?

Thanks,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090225/b4e62236/attachment.html>