[cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...

Mon Jan 5 13:38:00 EST 2009

Beware, CMMs won't support IOS past 12.4(15)T.   It's small print in the
IOS release notes.

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 7:50 AM
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: Linsemier, Matthew; cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...

The CMM has higher PRI port density than the 6608 (up to 3 6-port T1
modules) so I believe you can consider it a replacement for the 6608.
You can also run native IOS on your 6500 with the CMM.

Doesn't help that it was just EOS'd as well but you can at least buy
them through June of 2009.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/end_of_life_no
tice_c51-495784.html

-Ryan

On Dec 27, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:

Well, I have a lot of customers who are aggregating a LOT of PRIs on
6608s... what is Cisco going to replace it with?

Jonathan

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:37 AM, <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

I'm gonna miss being able to register one port to one cluster and
another port to a different cluster. 

Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst

Computing & Communications

University of Guelph

519-824-4120 x56354

...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;) 

[XKJ2000]

On Dec 27, 2008, at 10:25 AM, "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
wrote:

	Yeah, that sucks... I kind of like the 6608... but we just got a
2821 so, we will use that instead...

	Jonathan

	On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Linsemier, Matthew
<MLinsemier at apassurance.com> wrote:

	I was informed that the CCM-ACT's will not support this Codec
either, so I was a bit annoyed by this as well.  I would guess that the
6608 will probably fall in the same boat.  It looks like DSP farms in
routers running IOS is the way that Cisco wants us to transcode in the
future.

	MAtt

	From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
	Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:56 PM
	To: Ryan Ratliff
	Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] iLBC and Cisco 7965s...

	Right, I found the same info... it seems well supported in
12.4.15T and above in IOS (MGCP and H.323) but I have been unable to
find any info on transcoding/support on a 6608... my guess is the DSPs
can't handle the codec...

	Annoying.

	Jonathan

	On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Ryan Ratliff
<rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:

	Can't seem to find the 6608 downloads on cisco.com but the first
place I see that 6608 load is in a devpack from May of this year.
That's actually a lot newer than I would have thought.

	The gist of my first email is that I don't think you're going to
see support for iLBC on the 6608.  

	Unity Connections 7.0(1) I can see supports iLBC, not sure on
the Unity TSP.

	-Ryan

	On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:

	Well, I am running CCM 7.0.1

	The 6608 is running D00404000032 (base load from ccm 7)

	Unity TSP is 8.3.1

	7965 is running 8.4.1S (iLBC was supported in 8.3)

	Not sure what TSP or 6608 load supports iLBC... 

	Jonathan

	On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Ryan Ratliff
<rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:

	What load is your 6608 running?  What date was that load
released?

	When did the IP phones start supporting iLBC?

	I think the answer to those questions will tell you why you
can't get calls to your 6608 to use iLBC.

	As for Unity it just depends on if they have a TSP that supports
iLBC.

	-Ryan

	On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:

	OK, so how do we get this to work...?

	I have Cisco 7965s at remote sites (user's homes) and when they
make calls, their codec is showing up as G.729, even tho their region is
iLBC (G.728).

	My voice gateway is a 6608 (single PRI, rest are transcoders,
conf bridges)...

	Calls to Unity use G.729 as well...

	Calls to other 7965s (on net) are iLBC...

	So, how do I support this codec

	Jonathan

	_______________________________________________

	cisco-voip mailing list

	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

________________________________

	CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
	This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may
be protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for
the use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this
communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information block, the typed
name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to
constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
communication from your computer. Thank you. 

________________________________

	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________

cisco-voip mailing list

cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/9fc378a8/attachment.html>