[cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 5
António Fragoso
Antonio.Fragoso at bancobai.cv
Mon Jan 5 12:36:36 EST 2009
HI Jonatham
I didnt reconfigure the router
I am usin a BRI interface
Protocol MGCP
Telco send me 4 digits
The only change is :
I move all the IP PHONE from Callmanager express ( Gateway ROuter ) to Call Manager
Before , all the inbound Call was routing to IP PHONE 311
voice translation-rule 12
rule 1 /^2....../ /311/
I added a dial-peer 300 voice
dial-peer voice 300 voip
destination-pattern 3..
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:172.19.0.253
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
codec g711alaw
no vad
Antonio Fragoso
BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.
Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunicaçao
Edifício Santa Maria, 1º Andar
Chã de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459
Santiago, Cabo Verde
Tel.: +238 260 1224/26
Fax: +238 262 2810
antonio.fragoso at bancobai.cv
www.bancobai.cv
-----Mensagem original-----
De: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] Em nome de cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Enviada: segunda-feira, 5 de Janeiro de 2009 16:00
Para: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Assunto: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 5
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Incoming Call CallManager Express (Jonathan Charles)
2. Re: CCIE seat 09-april RTP (Voice Noob 3)
3. Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in Outlook
(Matthew Loraditch)
4. Re: voip appl debug is oddly useless in IOS 12.4 (Bernhard Albler)
5. Re: CCIE seat 09-april RTP (Ahmed Elnagar)
6. CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new AD domain
(MILLS, Mark)
7. Re: CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new ADdomain
(James Buchanan)
8. Re: Removing services from phones... (Tim Smith)
9. Cusco Unity issue (Cool Boy)
10. Re: Cusco Unity issue (Pat Hayes)
11. Re: How to configure a phone to play MOH after threerings
(Mooney, Nicholas)
12. Re: Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in Outlook (Pat Hayes)
13. Re: CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new ADdomain
(Justin Steinberg)
14. CUPC and CUPS on CUCM 6.1 (l brahmam)
15. Re: CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new ADdomain
(Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com)
16. Re: CUPC and CUPS on CUCM 6.1 (Matthew Saskin)
17. using Meetingplace Express VT as MCU (Ilya Rubinchik)
18. Re: using Meetingplace Express VT as MCU
(Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com)
19. Re: CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new ADdomain
(Dane Newman)
20. Re: CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new ADdomain
(Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com)
21. Re: Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in Outlook
(Jason Aarons (US))
22. Re: Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in Outlook
(Matthew Loraditch)
23. Upgrade IP IVR from 4.x to 7.x (voip at mrga.ch)
24. Re: Upgrade IP IVR from 4.x to 7.x (Matthew Loraditch)
25. Re: Phones and CCM versions (Fuermann, Jason)
26. Re: Phones and CCM versions (Lelio Fulgenzi)
27. Re: Strike 3 - Dead 7940G IP Phones - Update (Jason Aarons
(US)) (Fuermann, Jason)
28. Re: Strike 3 - Dead 7940G IP Phones - Update (Jason Aarons
(US)) (Micah Bennett)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:48:20 -0600
From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Incoming Call CallManager Express
To: " Ant?nio Fragoso " <Antonio.Fragoso at bancobai.cv>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<5d093f9a0901040948o15a56ca4u35837b48f6ca4115 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Did you reconfigure the router?
What interface? PRI, ANalog?
What protocol MGCP, H.323?
How many digits is telco sending you, how many are you set to receive?
If a PRI, send the output of your debug ISDN q931
Jonathan
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Ant?nio Fragoso <Antonio.Fragoso at bancobai.cv
> wrote:
> I team a need a help to configure a Incoming call on Callmanager
> Its was working fine on callmanager express.Now I have all phone on the
> CallManager v6
> And the Callmanager express is working just as a Gateway Router
>
>
> Antonio Fragoso
>
> BAI Cabo Verde, S.A.
> Departamento de Infraestrutura e Comunica?ao
> Edif?cio Santa Maria, 1? Andar
> Ch? de Areia - Praia, Cx. Postal - 459
> Santiago, Cabo Verde
> Tel.: +238 260 1224/26
> Fax: +238 262 2810
> antonio.fragoso at bancobai.cv
> www.bancobai.cv
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090104/4b2e2cce/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:16:55 -0800
From: "Voice Noob 3" <voicenoob3 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE seat 09-april RTP
To: "Ahmed Elnagar" <ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.com>
Cc: VOIP Group <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<c95d31e0901041116j4dcf6059t7acfdd80a4eece93 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
This is the umpteenth time you have posted this. This sounds like a scam.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Ahmed Elnagar <ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.com>wrote:
> Dear all
>
> 09-April in RTP is available now...for interested try to catch it...hurry
> up.
>
> Thanks,
> Ahmed Elnagar
>
> ------------------------------
> Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live
> Spaces. It's easy! Try it!<http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090104/f8a0714e/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:03:43 -0500
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in Outlook
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E624CC25709 at hermes.helion.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I just upgraded/migrated from Unity 4.2 standalone to 7.0 UM. All of the migrated voice mails are not showing the attached wav files. The messages are all the right size for having an attachment and the VMO addin sees the messages as the right IPM type.
Has anyone ever seen this? I just tested and new messages do work properly so unless anyone has a good idea I may just make the users deal with it. Old Messages also still do work from the phone.
Thanks in advance!
-Matthew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090104/717107d6/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:15:30 +0100
From: Bernhard Albler <Bernhard.Albler at nts.at>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] voip appl debug is oddly useless in IOS 12.4
To: Andrew Pogrebennyk <andrew.pogrebennyk at portaone.com>, Cisco
Mailing <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<58E3A987C96298428F32F9CE6BF2136E5056456D20 at srvgraz08.nts.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
could you specify, which ios version you are talking about? 12.4 (Mainline) or 12.4T.
Also, are you sure, the script is loaded (and hence executed)?
regards
bernhard
------------------------------------------
Bernhard Albler, NTS AG
Tel.: +43 (1) 867 67 76 -516, email: balbler at nts.at
------------------------------------------
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough.
-Mario Andretti
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:33:23 +0200
From: Ahmed Elnagar <ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE seat 09-april RTP
To: <voicenoob3 at gmail.com>
Cc: VOIP Group <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <BLU105-W24E68C74F68AADC30DACC487E00 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"
I cant got your point...what is the problem with my posts...if you are not interested just delete it...but I am sure that other people are facing problem with seat reservation as mine and this may help them...I remeber someone asked me for my seat that I was not able to pay for it and I told him that other one already asked for it so I thought that this may help him.
Thanks,Ahmed Elnagar
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:16:55 -0800From: voicenoob3 at gmail.comTo: ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.comSubject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCIE seat 09-april RTPCC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.netThis is the umpteenth time you have posted this. This sounds like a scam.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Ahmed Elnagar <ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear all 09-April in RTP is available now...for interested try to catch it...hurry up. Thanks,Ahmed Elnagar
Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! Try it!_______________________________________________cisco-voip mailing listcisco-voip at puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_________________________________________________________________
More than messages?check out the rest of the Windows Live?.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/ecaa7150/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:53:59 +1030
From: "MILLS, Mark" <mark.mills at baesystems.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new
AD domain
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<54DD8B39132EFA4293A5C0565004E5460D872DD6 at SBEMAIL1.au.baesystems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
Our current CCM6 installation uses Active Directory syncronisation for
all end users to a Windows domain.
In the near future, due to company acquisitions, the Windows Admin
groups are creating a new Windows AD domain and all users will be moved
over to the new domain and the old one turned off. The users will be
keeping the same username format and their telephone details etc will be
the same in the new AD structure that is being created.
Does anyone have any experience on what this would do to the users in
CCM, and how I would go about syncing against the new domain, but
keeping all the users, profiles and preferences the same to cause
minimum disruption to the end users? Im hoping it will be as simple
as pointing CCM at the new AD servers and it will figure everything out,
but nothing is ever as simple as I hope :)
Thanks in advanced,
- Mark
"Warning:
The information contained in this email and any attached files is
confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email
in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus
checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
your computer."
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:28:50 -0500
From: "James Buchanan" <jbuchanan at ctiusa.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to
new ADdomain
To: "MILLS, Mark" <mark.mills at baesystems.com>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<84FD0A05752C5C408C811C5D07205B25071A948B at EXCHANGE.ctiusa.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
To point to the new structure, you'll have to delete what is there
already and re-add it. This will result in all of the existing users
being marked inactive. At this point, if you disable the LDAP System,
you can manually delete the users. Then, you can setup everything again
from scratch.
Prior to any of this, you should be able to go under Bulk
Administration, Users, Export Users to export the existing user settings
with the phone association and profile associations. You should be able
to do an Update Users after resyncing to put everything back.
Sorry that there's no easy fix.
Thanks,
James
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of MILLS, Mark
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 7:24 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new
ADdomain
Hi,
Our current CCM6 installation uses Active Directory syncronisation for
all end users to a Windows domain.
In the near future, due to company acquisitions, the Windows Admin
groups are creating a new Windows AD domain and all users will be moved
over to the new domain and the old one turned off. The users will be
keeping the same username format and their telephone details etc will be
the same in the new AD structure that is being created.
Does anyone have any experience on what this would do to the users in
CCM, and how I would go about syncing against the new domain, but
keeping all the users, profiles and preferences the same to cause
minimum disruption to the end users? Im hoping it will be as simple
as pointing CCM at the new AD servers and it will figure everything out,
but nothing is ever as simple as I hope :)
Thanks in advanced,
- Mark
"Warning:
The information contained in this email and any attached files is
confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email
in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus
checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
your computer."
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.1/1869 - Release Date:
1/4/2009 4:32 PM
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:28:59 +0900
From: "Tim Smith" <thsglobal at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Removing services from phones...
To: "Tim Reimers" <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<202613020901041828k3ba94d7cl6ed0319a209bef9b at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
How many phones do you want to do this for?
It can be scripted with AXL quite easily.
But it would take a bit of time, so if it is not many phones may not be
worth it.
Cheers,
Tim
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Tim Reimers <treimers at ashevillenc.gov>wrote:
> Hi folks --
>
> Thanks to some assistance from you, I've learned to use BAT to update
> services, though only with having templates built for each type of phone.
> (anyone know if you can actually use a template from a 7960 to update
> services on a 7961 or 7940 safely?)
>
> But -- there's no mention in the BAT guide about removing a subscribed
> service...
> There is mention of removing a duplicate name --- but the service I need to
> remove is not a duplicate name to anything I'm installing.
>
> anyone know how I can remove a service from multiple phones?
> It's not a unique service of any kind --- but I'm not removing a duplicate
> service either...
>
> Device pools are the selection criteria for querying phones to work with
> (query, not CSV)
>
>
> Tim Reimers
> Systems Analyst II
> Information Technology Services
> City of Asheville
> 70 Court Plaza
> Asheville, NC 28801
> phone - 828-259-5512
> treimers at ashevillenc.gov <timreimers at ashevillenc.gov>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/22057c65/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:43:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Cool Boy <collboy80 at yahoo.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cusco Unity issue
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <99106.15945.qm at web59415.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Guys,
?
This is regarding Cisco Unity subscriber issue on Unity 5.0.
When a subscriber logs into voicemail system by phone, he hears the following options
Press 1 to hear the voice messages
press 2 to send a message
press 4 to setup the mail box
press 0 for subscriber help.
?
If a user presses 0, he will get the subscriber help messages. but if the user did not press 0 and the menu will repeat, and then user press 0 he hears the error, ( I did not hear any entry) but if he press 2 or 4 he gets through these options. Please advise.
?
Regards
Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090104/e2df3d32/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:56:20 -0500
From: "Pat Hayes" <pat-cv at wcyv.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cusco Unity issue
To: "Cool Boy" <collboy80 at yahoo.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<1e877ff90901041956scf0fb11y192de841c4bfcdb3 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Which subscriber conversation are you using? Sounds like you might be
using 'optional conversation 1', and if that is the case, that would
match the symptoms of CSCso39027
TUI-OptionalConv: 0 for playback help invalid during header/footer
Symptom: Pressing 0 while a message's header or footer information
does not lead to message playback help. Instead, you are told the
keypress is invalid. Conditions: This occurs in Cisco Unity 5.0(1).
Workaround: There is no workaround, but pressing 0 while the message
content is played will lead to message playback help
It looks like it is fixed in a number of ESs, including ES64, which is
currently posted on CCO.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Cool Boy <collboy80 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> This is regarding Cisco Unity subscriber issue on Unity 5.0.
>
> When a subscriber logs into voicemail system by phone, he hears the
> following options
>
> Press 1 to hear the voice messages
>
> press 2 to send a message
>
> press 4 to setup the mail box
>
> press 0 for subscriber help..
>
>
>
> If a user presses 0, he will get the subscriber help messages. but if the
> user did not press 0 and the menu will repeat, and then user press 0 he
> hears the error, ( I did not hear any entry) but if he press 2 or 4 he gets
> through these options. Please advise.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> ________________________________
> Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take a
> look.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:17:14 +1100
From: "Mooney, Nicholas" <Nicholas.Mooney at astrazeneca.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How to configure a phone to play MOH after
threerings
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<575695B8A80D124E92AEAE1633ACC1F001D5BC6C at ausyasembx01.asiapac.astrazeneca.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I think you could start the Attendant Console service and configure a pilot point that queue's calls and uses the network MoH source during the queing. Then just call the AC pilot point without any AC users logged in and you should just hear the music as you wait for an AC user to become ready.
If there is a better way i'd like to hear it -- as for me, listening to MoH stream is also a good way to test actual call quality on VoWLAN phones when walking down stairs, carparks etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Michael Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, 30 December 2008 11:15 PM
To: 'abuch'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How to configure a phone to play MOH after threerings
Only way I can think to do automagically that is to run it thru UCCX and have it sit in a queue. That will feed MOH to the caller. I'm sure there's components within CUAE that could allow this, but I'm not familiar enough with it to say for sure.
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of abuch
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 2:39 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] How to configure a phone to play MOH after three rings
Dear,
How can I configure a phone in CUCM 6.1 to play MOH after three rings? this to test GSM to inside network voice call quality from different location by calling from GSM to a fixed DN.
regards,
Abebe A.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/a8fa388c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:45:51 -0500
From: "Pat Hayes" <pat-cv at wcyv.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in
Outlook
To: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<1e877ff90901041945k35506380x1522d02f90f1983e at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Don't think I've seen that issue, but could you provide some more
details? What process did you follow to upgrade/migrate? Are you able
to see the attached wave files properly from an Outlook client without
VMO installed? What version of VMO/outlook? Do you see the voicemail
icon next to the old messages (like you presumably do next to the new
ones)? Do the playback controls appear for these messages?
-Pat
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Loraditch
<MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
> I just upgraded/migrated from Unity 4.2 standalone to 7.0 UM. All of the
> migrated voice mails are not showing the attached wav files. The messages
> are all the right size for having an attachment and the VMO addin sees the
> messages as the right IPM type.
>
>
>
> Has anyone ever seen this? I just tested and new messages do work properly
> so unless anyone has a good idea I may just make the users deal with it. Old
> Messages also still do work from the phone.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> -Matthew
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:48:58 -0500
From: "Justin Steinberg" <jsteinberg at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to
new ADdomain
To: "James Buchanan" <jbuchanan at ctiusa.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<f1b65f880901042048l2baa1f56n8cbdc6c90046de8b at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
This has not been my experience on 6.1.
You should be able to disable ldap synch to the old Active Directory and
repoint to the new Active Directory. Accounts will go to the inactive state
when you disable the old active directory, but as long as you point CM back
to the new Active Directory AND the usernames in CM match the usernames in
the new AD everything will sync back up and the CM user accounts will go
from inactive to active on the next sync. Data such as device associations,
speed dials, etc will remain.
You just have to do all of this at the same time because you have to be
cognizant of the garbage process whenever you have accounts in the
'inactive' state. (i.e. If you leave them inactive for too long they will be
deleted and if this happens you will lose all of your associations.) For
more info on the garbage process, read the SRND.
Justin
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:28 PM, James Buchanan <jbuchanan at ctiusa.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> To point to the new structure, you'll have to delete what is there
> already and re-add it. This will result in all of the existing users
> being marked inactive. At this point, if you disable the LDAP System,
> you can manually delete the users. Then, you can setup everything again
> from scratch.
>
> Prior to any of this, you should be able to go under Bulk
> Administration, Users, Export Users to export the existing user settings
> with the phone association and profile associations. You should be able
> to do an Update Users after resyncing to put everything back.
>
> Sorry that there's no easy fix.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of MILLS, Mark
> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 7:24 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to new
> ADdomain
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Our current CCM6 installation uses Active Directory syncronisation for
> all end users to a Windows domain.
>
> In the near future, due to company acquisitions, the Windows Admin
> groups are creating a new Windows AD domain and all users will be moved
> over to the new domain and the old one turned off. The users will be
> keeping the same username format and their telephone details etc will be
> the same in the new AD structure that is being created.
>
> Does anyone have any experience on what this would do to the users in
> CCM, and how I would go about syncing against the new domain, but
> keeping all the users, profiles and preferences the same to cause
> minimum disruption to the end users? Im hoping it will be as simple
> as pointing CCM at the new AD servers and it will figure everything out,
> but nothing is ever as simple as I hope :)
>
> Thanks in advanced,
> - Mark
> "Warning:
> The information contained in this email and any attached files is
> confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
> attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email
> in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
> taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
> however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
> sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus
> checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
> your computer."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.1/1869 - Release Date:
> 1/4/2009 4:32 PM
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090104/884c6568/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:22:26 +0530
From: "l brahmam" <lbrahmam at gmail.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUPC and CUPS on CUCM 6.1
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<a67492070901042252k596af602t544e83441598b15a at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Dear All
Kindly let me know how to enable CUPC and CUPS on CUCM 6.1.
Thanks
Brahmam. L
--
--
\\\||///
\\ - - //
( @ @ )
-oOo--( )--oOo-------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/c71b391e/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:19:16 -0000
From: <Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to
new ADdomain
To: <mark.mills at baesystems.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<568BC086983B9544993FA5104CF68E1A057FBAE1 at LDNPCMEU304VEUA.INTRANET.BARCAPINT.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
If they do a proper migration... They will keep the same SAM/SID and you
should be fine, I haven't done it myself with respect to CUCM, but I
would assume if you allow both OU's in the LDAP synch.. When they move
them over, you might be fine...
However test and confirm this in the lab / with your AS team first...
It maybe that CUCM thinks when it can't see it via one query that the
account is indeed inactive... Need to read up if CUCM copies the account
and what other references are being added when it does.
Easy test would be, add a different OU to be synched... Move a user into
that OU and see what CUCM thinks.. Verify with your AD team how they are
performing the migration... And tell them to do it clean :) so users
keep sid/sam.
Cheers
T
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of MILLS, Mark
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 1:24 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users
> to new ADdomain
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Our current CCM6 installation uses Active Directory
> syncronisation for all end users to a Windows domain.
>
> In the near future, due to company acquisitions, the Windows
> Admin groups are creating a new Windows AD domain and all
> users will be moved over to the new domain and the old one
> turned off. The users will be keeping the same username
> format and their telephone details etc will be the same in
> the new AD structure that is being created.
>
> Does anyone have any experience on what this would do to the
> users in CCM, and how I would go about syncing against the
> new domain, but keeping all the users, profiles and
> preferences the same to cause
> minimum disruption to the end users? Im hoping it will be as simple
> as pointing CCM at the new AD servers and it will figure
> everything out, but nothing is ever as simple as I hope :)
>
> Thanks in advanced,
> - Mark
> "Warning:
> The information contained in this email and any attached
> files is confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of
> this email or any attachments is expressly prohibited. If
> you have received this email in error, please notify us
> immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been taken to ensure this
> email and its attachments are virus free, however, any loss
> or damage incurred in using this email is not the sender's
> responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus
> checks are completed before installing any data sent in this
> email to your computer."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
_______________________________________________
This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays Capital is the investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered offi!
ce at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group.
_______________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 06:54:08 -0500
From: "Matthew Saskin" <msaskin at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUPC and CUPS on CUCM 6.1
To: "l brahmam" <lbrahmam at gmail.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<bbbb0f690901050354g7b8349a6q54c8a47263478301 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Have you installed CUPS on a separate server? Have you read any of
the documentation at all?
On 1/5/09, l brahmam <lbrahmam at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All
>
> Kindly let me know how to enable CUPC and CUPS on CUCM 6.1.
>
>
> Thanks
> Brahmam. L
>
> --
> --
> \\\||///
> \\ - - //
> ( @ @ )
> -oOo--( )--oOo-------------------------------------------------------
>
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:49:57 +0500
From: Ilya Rubinchik <ilya.rubinchik at abrisdc.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] using Meetingplace Express VT as MCU
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <A7082A74BDC13849BDDC417A5ABB20B6B18BD6B79B at dc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Hi!
I've configured MPE-VT as video conference bridge in CCM 6.1.1.
MCU successful registers using SCCP protocol.
But I cannot switch on video from CIPC+CUVA while in conference created by this MCU.
Whats the problem may be?
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
--
Ilya Rubinchik
Systems Engineer
Telecommunication Systems Division
ABRIS DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Tel: UZ: +998711405300 (ext. 2451)
Mobile: UZ: +998977128456
Fax: UZ: +998712995155
ICQ # 15508236
MSN: ilya.rubinchik at gmail.com<mailto:ilya.rubinchik at gmail.com>
E-mail: ilya.rubinchik at abrisdc.com<mailto:ilya.rubinchik at abrisdc.com>
[cid:image001.png at 01C96F55.2E08C600]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/d358c57a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 27647 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/d358c57a/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:28:28 -0000
From: <Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] using Meetingplace Express VT as MCU
To: <ilya.rubinchik at abrisdc.com>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<568BC086983B9544993FA5104CF68E1A057FBAF0 at LDNPCMEU304VEUA.INTRANET.BARCAPINT.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Check the codec u r using is supported/enabled by the MCU.
As u r saying it's CIPC.... If it's remote.. Check that u don't have any ACL's or FW's blocking.
Hth
T
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ilya
> Rubinchik
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] using Meetingplace Express VT as MCU
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> I've configured MPE-VT as video conference bridge in CCM 6.1.1.
>
> MCU successful registers using SCCP protocol.
>
> But I cannot switch on video from CIPC+CUVA while in
> conference created by this MCU.
>
>
>
> Whats the problem may be?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ilya Rubinchik
>
> Systems Engineer
>
> Telecommunication Systems Division
>
> ABRIS DISTRIBUTION, INC.
>
> Tel: UZ: +998711405300 (ext. 2451)
>
> Mobile: UZ: +998977128456
>
> Fax: UZ: +998712995155
>
> ICQ # 15508236
>
> MSN: ilya.rubinchik at gmail.com <mailto:ilya.rubinchik at gmail.com>
>
> E-mail: ilya.rubinchik at abrisdc.com
> <mailto:ilya.rubinchik at abrisdc.com>
>
>
>
> ??????????1
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays Capital is the investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered offi!
ce at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group.
_______________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:06:33 -0500
From: Dane Newman <dane.newman at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to
new ADdomain
To: "<Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com>"
<Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com>
Cc: "<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <81DA16D9-233F-4B45-AA9C-FCCE8296BF9D at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
They will keep the same Sam but not sid you might bethinking of the
sid history attribute which is migrated to retain access to resources
but is stripped at the end of a migration for securty best practices
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:19 AM, <Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com> wrote:
> If they do a proper migration... They will keep the same SAM/SID and
> you
> should be fine, I haven't done it myself with respect to CUCM, but I
> would assume if you allow both OU's in the LDAP synch.. When they move
> them over, you might be fine...
>
> However test and confirm this in the lab / with your AS team first...
>
> It maybe that CUCM thinks when it can't see it via one query that the
> account is indeed inactive... Need to read up if CUCM copies the
> account
> and what other references are being added when it does.
>
> Easy test would be, add a different OU to be synched... Move a user
> into
> that OU and see what CUCM thinks.. Verify with your AD team how they
> are
> performing the migration... And tell them to do it clean :) so users
> keep sid/sam.
>
> Cheers
> T
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of MILLS, Mark
>> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 1:24 AM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users
>> to new ADdomain
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Our current CCM6 installation uses Active Directory
>> syncronisation for all end users to a Windows domain.
>>
>> In the near future, due to company acquisitions, the Windows
>> Admin groups are creating a new Windows AD domain and all
>> users will be moved over to the new domain and the old one
>> turned off. The users will be keeping the same username
>> format and their telephone details etc will be the same in
>> the new AD structure that is being created.
>>
>> Does anyone have any experience on what this would do to the
>> users in CCM, and how I would go about syncing against the
>> new domain, but keeping all the users, profiles and
>> preferences the same to cause
>> minimum disruption to the end users? Im hoping it will be as
>> simple
>> as pointing CCM at the new AD servers and it will figure
>> everything out, but nothing is ever as simple as I hope :)
>>
>> Thanks in advanced,
>> - Mark
>> "Warning:
>> The information contained in this email and any attached
>> files is confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are
>> not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of
>> this email or any attachments is expressly prohibited. If
>> you have received this email in error, please notify us
>> immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been taken to ensure this
>> email and its attachments are virus free, however, any loss
>> or damage incurred in using this email is not the sender's
>> responsibility. It is your responsibility to ensure virus
>> checks are completed before installing any data sent in this
>> email to your computer."
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
> This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged
> or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended
> recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any
> means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender
> that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated,
> this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy
> or sell any securities, investment products or other financial
> product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or
> an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented
> are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
> those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the
> following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with
> Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays Capital is the
> investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, a company
> registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered offi!
> ce at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to
> or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group.
> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:13:50 -0000
From: <Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving users to
new ADdomain
To: <dane.newman at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<568BC086983B9544993FA5104CF68E1A057FBAF1 at LDNPCMEU304VEUA.INTRANET.BARCAPINT.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Doh, forgot the sid cleanup indeed...
SAM should be enough though as CUCM won't have visibility of SID or even
if, won't understand it. It's not a supported attrib/field afaik
But thx for clarifying. Good old AD days ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dane Newman [mailto:dane.newman at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 1:07 PM
> To: Mayr, Thorsten: IT (LDN)
> Cc: <mark.mills at baesystems.com>; <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving
> users to new ADdomain
>
> They will keep the same Sam but not sid you might bethinking
> of the sid history attribute which is migrated to retain
> access to resources but is stripped at the end of a migration
> for securty best practices
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:19 AM, <Thorsten.Mayr at barclayscapital.com> wrote:
>
> > If they do a proper migration... They will keep the same
> SAM/SID and
> > you should be fine, I haven't done it myself with respect
> to CUCM, but
> > I would assume if you allow both OU's in the LDAP synch.. When they
> > move them over, you might be fine...
> >
> > However test and confirm this in the lab / with your AS
> team first...
> >
> > It maybe that CUCM thinks when it can't see it via one
> query that the
> > account is indeed inactive... Need to read up if CUCM copies the
> > account and what other references are being added when it does.
> >
> > Easy test would be, add a different OU to be synched... Move a user
> > into that OU and see what CUCM thinks.. Verify with your AD
> team how
> > they are performing the migration... And tell them to do it
> clean :)
> > so users keep sid/sam.
> >
> > Cheers
> > T
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> MILLS, Mark
> >> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 1:24 AM
> >> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM6 with AD integration - moving
> users to new
> >> ADdomain
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Our current CCM6 installation uses Active Directory syncronisation
> >> for all end users to a Windows domain.
> >>
> >> In the near future, due to company acquisitions, the Windows Admin
> >> groups are creating a new Windows AD domain and all users will be
> >> moved over to the new domain and the old one turned off.
> The users
> >> will be keeping the same username format and their
> telephone details
> >> etc will be the same in the new AD structure that is being created.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any experience on what this would do to
> the users in
> >> CCM, and how I would go about syncing against the new domain, but
> >> keeping all the users, profiles and preferences the same to cause
> >> minimum disruption to the end users? Im hoping it will be as
> >> simple
> >> as pointing CCM at the new AD servers and it will figure
> everything
> >> out, but nothing is ever as simple as I hope :)
> >>
> >> Thanks in advanced,
> >> - Mark
> >> "Warning:
> >> The information contained in this email and any attached files is
> >> confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
> >> recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
> >> attachments is expressly prohibited. If you have received
> this email
> >> in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
> >> taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
> >> however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email
> is not the
> >> sender's responsibility. It is your responsibility to
> ensure virus
> >> checks are completed before installing any data sent in
> this email to
> >> your computer."
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > This e-mail may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged
> > or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended
> > recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute
> it by any
> > means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the
> sender that
> > you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this
> > e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to
> buy or sell
> > any securities, investment products or other financial product or
> > service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an
> official
> > statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely
> > those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
> > Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the
> following
> > link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with
> Barclays you
> > consent to the foregoing. Barclays Capital is the
> investment banking
> > division of Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in
> England (number
> > 1026167) with its registered offi!
> > ce at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may
> relate to or
> > be sent from other members of the Barclays Group.
> > _______________________________________________
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
_______________________________________________
This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unless specifically indicated, this e-mail is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Barclays. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Barclays. This e-mail is subject to terms available at the following link: www.barcap.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Barclays you consent to the foregoing. Barclays Capital is the investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC, a company registered in England (number 1026167) with its registered offi!
ce at 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. This email may relate to or be sent from other members of the Barclays Group.
_______________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:27:12 -0500
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in
Outlook
To: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00D183B09 at USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Did you update Viewmail for Outlook? What version VMO are you using?
On a PC without viewmail do you see the attachment and does it play in
Windows Media Player?
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew
Loraditch
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 4:04 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in Outlook
I just upgraded/migrated from Unity 4.2 standalone to 7.0 UM. All of the
migrated voice mails are not showing the attached wav files. The
messages are all the right size for having an attachment and the VMO
addin sees the messages as the right IPM type.
Has anyone ever seen this? I just tested and new messages do work
properly so unless anyone has a good idea I may just make the users deal
with it. Old Messages also still do work from the phone.
Thanks in advance!
-Matthew
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/cb2f1a31/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:50:03 -0500
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in
Outlook
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E624CC2572E at hermes.helion.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
This happens with and w/o VMO (newest version 7) at this point I've just told the users to deal with it. From some googling my best guess is the mime type on the imported messages is incorrect I found some other cases where attachments would be invisible b/c of wrongly encoded messages
Matthew Loraditch
10944 Beaver Dam Road, Suite A
Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593
Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com>
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!
From: Jason Aarons (US) [mailto:jason.aarons at us.didata.com]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 8:27 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in Outlook
Did you update Viewmail for Outlook? What version VMO are you using?
On a PC without viewmail do you see the attachment and does it play in Windows Media Player?
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 4:04 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Voice Mails "Attachments" not visible in Outlook
I just upgraded/migrated from Unity 4.2 standalone to 7.0 UM. All of the migrated voice mails are not showing the attached wav files. The messages are all the right size for having an attachment and the VMO addin sees the messages as the right IPM type.
Has anyone ever seen this? I just tested and new messages do work properly so unless anyone has a good idea I may just make the users deal with it. Old Messages also still do work from the phone.
Thanks in advance!
-Matthew
________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/2c2efcba/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 23
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:59:27 +0100 (CET)
From: "voip at mrga.ch" <voip at mrga.ch>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrade IP IVR from 4.x to 7.x
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <1921810596.14013.1231167567548.JavaMail.open-xchange at ox3>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello group
we plan to upgarde our Ip IVR from Version 4.x to 7.x. I am looking for some
planing and installation guids on the Cisco website, but I can't find
documentation in this. Has anyone a link to the IP IVR 7.x documentation site?
On what operating system is Ip IVR 7.x based. Is it still Windows or is it also
an appliance like CUCM?
Thanks for feedback
Reto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/4e06214a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 24
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:24:33 -0500
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrade IP IVR from 4.x to 7.x
To: "voip at mrga.ch" <voip at mrga.ch>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E624CC2573E at hermes.helion.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
IVR uses the Cisco Customized 2003 OS.
I just did one of these upgrades and the best thing is to have new hardware because the upgrade is more like a cut and paste. You have to manually copy all settings/files etc. If you will be using the same hardware, backup everything and take tons of screenshots
HTH
Matthew Loraditch
10944 Beaver Dam Road, Suite A
Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593
Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com>
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of voip at mrga.ch
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 9:59 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Upgrade IP IVR from 4.x to 7.x
Hello group
we plan to upgarde our Ip IVR from Version 4.x to 7.x. I am looking for some planing and installation guids on the Cisco website, but I can't find documentation in this. Has anyone a link to the IP IVR 7.x documentation site?
On what operating system is Ip IVR 7.x based. Is it still Windows or is it also an appliance like CUCM?
Thanks for feedback
Reto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/ca643052/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:36:45 -0600
From: "Fuermann, Jason" <JBF005 at shsu.edu>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones and CCM versions
To: "'Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila'" <jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>, David
Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<8FAC1E47484E43469AA28DBF35C955E40FACD13AF7 at EXMBX.SHSU.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Not exactly true. Most phones continue to enjoy support from later versions of CUCM but some are abandoned. Found this out the hard way with some 7936's
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 9:24 AM
To: David Zhars; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones and CCM versions
CCM 6.X supports everything down to the very first Phones. What will happen is that as the older phones stop getting Firmware revisions, they stay with the latest code for that unit. Obviously some newer features may not work on those phones but they will work flawlessly. I just upgraded a Site that has about a hundred 7910s and is running 6.1.3 without issues.
Jorge Rodr?guez Aguila
CCNA,CCVP,CRMCS,CIPCES
Senior Voice/Data Network Consultant
Netxar Technologies
jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com
Office 787-765-0058
PCS 787-688-8530
[cid:image001.png at 01C96F19.1F7A15D0]
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Zhars
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:44 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Phones and CCM versions
We have 4.1 CCM and Unity. Lot of 7912s, 7940s, 7960s.
If we upgrade to CCM 6, are all those phones still supported and will continue to work in CCM6?
I'm a little confused from Cisco's documentation!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/4e58a9ed/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6292 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/4e58a9ed/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 26
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:43:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones and CCM versions
To: Jason Fuermann <JBF005 at shsu.edu>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<570660381.443531231170239134.JavaMail.root at superior.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Can you clarify this point? The 7936 has a default load listed for v7.0(1) so it should be supported.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Fuermann" <JBF005 at shsu.edu>
To: "Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila" <jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>, "David Zhars" <dzhars at gmail.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2009 10:36:45 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones and CCM versions
Not exactly true. Most phones continue to enjoy support from later versions of CUCM but some are abandoned. Found this out the hard way with some 7936?s
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 9:24 AM
To: David Zhars; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones and CCM versions
CCM 6.X supports everything down to the very first Phones. What will happen is that as the older phones stop getting Firmware revisions, they stay with the latest code for that unit. Obviously some newer features may not work on those phones but they will work flawlessly. I just upgraded a Site that has about a hundred 7910s and is running 6.1.3 without issues.
Jorge Rodr?guez Aguila
CCNA,CCVP,CRMCS,CIPCES
Senior Voice/Data Network Consultant
Netxar Technologies
jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com
Office 787-765-0058
PCS 787-688-8530
netxar
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Zhars
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:44 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Phones and CCM versions
We have 4.1 CCM and Unity. Lot of 7912s, 7940s, 7960s.
If we upgrade to CCM 6, are all those phones still supported and will continue to work in CCM6?
I'm a little confused from Cisco's documentation!
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/7c5bc1d6/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 27
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:52:27 -0600
From: "Fuermann, Jason" <JBF005 at shsu.edu>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Strike 3 - Dead 7940G IP Phones - Update
(Jason Aarons (US))
To: "'FrogOnDSCP46EF'" <ciscoboy2006 at gmail.com>,
"'jason.aarons at us.didata.com'" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<8FAC1E47484E43469AA28DBF35C955E40FACD13AF8 at EXMBX.SHSU.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
We had a similar problem with improperly shielded 7940's. Our mobile radios would cause the phone to reset when we PTT. Never had any phones completely dead from it though. I wouldn't count on a cable tester to pick up this RF interference because it could be well out of range from the frequency the cable tester is using. Cisco replaced all our phones as they said this was a defect in earlier versions. Your best bet is probably going to be to move phone and printer as far away from each other as possible. In our case this was about 6 ft. Hope this helps
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of FrogOnDSCP46EF
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 9:06 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Strike 3 - Dead 7940G IP Phones - Update (Jason Aarons (US))
Hi Jason,
Good recap!! Thanks for sharing this on this forum.
To check EMI, you can use a good CAT5/6 cable tester.
1. Check EMI of your bad cable - make a note of all parameters, there are more than EMI.
2. Check EMI of your any of other good cable - and then compare the parameter, at least you can show that comparative to your customer.
HTH
--
Smile, you'll save someone else's day!
Frog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/00cd5abc/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 28
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:05:42 -0600
From: "Micah Bennett" <mbennett at als-xtn.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Strike 3 - Dead 7940G IP Phones - Update
(Jason Aarons (US))
To: "Fuermann, Jason" <JBF005 at shsu.edu>, "FrogOnDSCP46EF"
<ciscoboy2006 at gmail.com>, <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<160C116A79522E4B9404937D2E28811D016A11DE at exchange02.alsnet.als-xtn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks everyone.
Yes, we have no way to test, and even if we did, it seems to be
intermittent. Like I said earlier, we went 4 months with no issues and
then 5 more phones died during our testing. I have removed the phone
from this station and I am looking at the options to move that printer
somewhere else if they decide they need a phone there.
Micah Bennett
_____
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Fuermann, Jason
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 9:52 AM
To: 'FrogOnDSCP46EF'; 'jason.aarons at us.didata.com';
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Strike 3 - Dead 7940G IP Phones - Update
(Jason Aarons (US))
We had a similar problem with improperly shielded 7940's. Our mobile
radios would cause the phone to reset when we PTT. Never had any phones
completely dead from it though. I wouldn't count on a cable tester to
pick up this RF interference because it could be well out of range from
the frequency the cable tester is using. Cisco replaced all our phones
as they said this was a defect in earlier versions. Your best bet is
probably going to be to move phone and printer as far away from each
other as possible. In our case this was about 6 ft. Hope this helps
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of FrogOnDSCP46EF
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 9:06 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Strike 3 - Dead 7940G IP Phones - Update (Jason
Aarons (US))
Hi Jason,
Good recap!! Thanks for sharing this on this forum.
To check EMI, you can use a good CAT5/6 cable tester.
1. Check EMI of your bad cable - make a note of all parameters, there
are more than EMI.
2. Check EMI of your any of other good cable - and then compare the
parameter, at least you can show that comparative to your customer.
HTH
--
Smile, you'll save someone else's day!
Frog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090105/4ccea75f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 63, Issue 5
*****************************************
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list