[cisco-voip] CallerID H323 IOS 12.4(22)

[David Zhars]

OK, now I get the name but no number!  Is there anyway to have both??

Thanks.



On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:34 PM, David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yep, it's T.
>
> So I need the 'isdn supp service name-calling'?
>
> I will give that a shot!
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  I can confirm that you need .T . I just did this last night, Started
>> with mainline and the commands are not there. Switched to .T and works like
>> a champ.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:54 AM
>> *To:* David Zhars
>> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CallerID H323 IOS 12.4(22)
>>
>>
>>
>> David--
>>
>>
>>
>> you said 12.4.22...... is this T or not.  My understanding to get it
>> native (without TCL script) you have to have a minimum of 12.4.20T.  main
>> line would not cover that(at least that is my understanding).
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:33 AM, David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All.
>>
>> reconfigured my main VGW to H323.  I found a link which says you can now
>> get the name and number from CallerID with
>> H323, as long as you have version 12.4.
>>
>> Yet when people call in on the ISDN line, they are just getting the number
>> and no name.
>>
>> Relevant config portion:
>>
>> voice class h323 1
>>   h225 timeout tcp establish 3
>>  h225 display-ie ccm-compatible  (this is supposed to be the magic line!)
>>
>> controller T1 0/1/0
>>  pri-group timeslots 9-24
>>
>> interface Serial0/1/0:23
>>  no ip address
>>  encapsulation hdlc
>>  isdn switch-type primary-ni
>>  isdn incoming-voice voice
>>  no cdp enable
>>
>> no ccm-manager fax protocol cisco
>> !
>> no mgcp package-capability res-package
>> no mgcp package-capability fxr-package
>> no mgcp timer receive-rtcp
>>
>> num-exp 8812 1752
>>
>> Now, the number I am testing with is 555-8812.  Which when it comes in, we
>> convert it to 1752 and CCM pushes that to 1712.
>> Is it possible with all the number translating and routing I am losing the
>> Caller ID name?  Or is this just a pipe dream and the only way
>> to get Caller ID Name is with MGCP?
>>
>> Thanks anyone!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090114/49fad946/attachment.html>