[cisco-voip] trace settings for appliances

[Matthew Saskin]

We've got clients on 7845 equivalents whose standard is to leave
debugging to detailed - this is on subs with between 5k and 10k phones
registered.  No ill effects seen thusfar - they're on 5x fwiw.

On 1/14/09, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> My colleague reminds me that we actually have our traces set to detailed. I
> wonder if this is possible without melting the machines.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:29:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: trace settings for appliances
>
>
> We've typically left trace set to arbitrary on our CCM 4.1 servers so we can
> actually find them useful, otherwise, if we have to set it after the fact,
> we can't find the problem.
>
> We have had no problem whatsoever, likely do to the size of the servers and
> the load, we're using 7845s with about 1500 phones registered to each
> server.
>
> Anyone have any experience leaving the trace settings on arbitrary on the
> appliances? I know that you need to use RTMT to collect things, but I'm
> wondering if the server itself stores them for a while as well. Obviously
> downloading them causes some strain, but again, they're not busy.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>