[cisco-voip] Does "Caller ID DN" on gateway trump all other settings?
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Tue Jul 14 16:01:53 EDT 2009
Cool. Thanks for the second set of eyes.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Staffin" <craig at staffin.org>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:59:49 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does "Caller ID DN" on gateway trump all other settings?
the short answer is yes
The way that CUCM does it is based on the call flow. So the last thing to touch the call will be the ultimate say.
So route pattern - Route list -- route group --- Gateway
Craig
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca > wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is the case, but if I have an explicit DN on the gateway configuration page in " Caller ID DN" , i.e. no X's, does this not trump whatever you have on the phones, route patterns, etc?
Lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090714/cd7d6325/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list