[cisco-voip] Slow to connect calls

Jeff Ruttman ruttmanj at carewisc.org
Thu Jun 25 14:16:09 EDT 2009


Thanks Cristobal, Ian.
 
There doesn't appear to be a dial plan problem.  See below.
 
I'm open to changing protocol to H.323, but I wouldn't know how to do
that exactly at the moment.  And anyway as I mentioned we have an H.323
GW for each of the sites that use Trunks and POTS.  They've always had a
status of "unknown" and if you view their config, the registration is
unknown.  2 of the 4 have a device name/IP address that is the same as
the routers at those sites, and the other 2 have a device name/IP
address that is the same as the IP on the FXO and FXS CCM configs on the
MGCP GWs for these sites.  They are otherwise configured the same.
 
Are these H.323 GWs just ornamental??  Are they doing anything?
Certainly the MGCP GWs are....
 
I'll keep plugging away.  Little by little I'll catch on.
 
Thanks
jeff
 
*	Results Summary 

*	Calling Party Information 

	*	Calling Party = 5801 
	*	Partition = 
	*	Device CSS = 
	*	Line CSS = MO1Phones 
	*	AAR Group Name = 
	*	AAR CSS = 

*	Dialed Digits = 92977902 
*	Match Result = RouteThisPattern 
*	Matched Pattern Information 

	*	Pattern = 9.[2-9]XXXXXX 
	*	Partition = MO1Routes 
	*	Time Schedule = 

*	Called Party Number = 92977902 
*	Time Zone = Central Standard/Daylight Time 
*	End Device = MO1-RL-Local 
*	Call Classification = OffNet 
*	InterDigit Timeout = NO 
*	Device Override = Disabled 
*	Outside Dial Tone = NO 


________________________________

From: Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpriego at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:28 AM
To: Ian MacKinnon
Cc: Jeff Ruttman; cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Slow to connect calls


Sounds like Ian is right. you can have a dial plan problem
do you have a centralized deployment? if you do, you need to be very
careful with the delay of MGCP, because this is a Master-Slave protocol.
MGCP has a dependency of callmanager, so before you can place a call,
the gw needs to talk to the CUCM to know what to do. if that's the case
I'd say the best option for you is to change your protocol to H.323.


Cris


2009/6/25 Ian MacKinnon <Ian.Mackinnon at lumison.net>


	Hi Jeff,

	That sounds like a dial plan problem ie it is waiting for
another digit, and then timing out.

	 

	Can you dial the number before hitting dial on the phone so it
is all present as opposed to lifting the handset and dialling each digit
in turn?

	 

	From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Ruttman
	Sent: 25 June 2009 14:47
	To: cisco-voip
	Subject: [cisco-voip] Slow to connect calls

	 

	Greetings,

	 

	Some of our sites have DID trunk ports and POTS lines, and we
have MGCP controlled GWs with FXS and FXO configured.  We also have for
these sites H.323 GWs--which frankly I'm not sure why or what they do.

	 

	Anyway, at one of those sites, it takes a count of 15 or more
for an outgoing call to connect.  I know some delay is expected with
that setup, but that's quite a bit longer than at our comparable sites.

	 

	Is that length of delay still within expectations?  Or is there
something perhaps I can do to speed that up?

	 

	Thanks

	jeff

	 

	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email
including attachments is intended for the specific delivery to and use
by the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and includes information
which should be considered as private and confidential. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please reply to
the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of
it from your computer system. Thank you.


________________________________

	--
	
	This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended
	solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
	If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender. Any
	offers or quotation of service are subject to formal
specification.
	Errors and omissions excepted. Please note that any views or
opinions
	presented in this email are solely those of the author and do
not
	necessarily represent those of Lumison.
	Finally, the recipient should check this email and any
attachments for the
	presence of viruses. Lumison accept no liability for any
	damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
	

	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
	
	


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email including attachments is intended for the specific delivery to and use by the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and includes information which should be considered as private and confidential. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please reply to the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090625/cd79c823/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list