[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

[Scott Voll]

Easiest way would be do it on the phones themselves via BAT.

are the GW's H323?  could do it at the VGW end.

Scott

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us> wrote:

>  Yeah, I don't think that will work.  From what I understand of local
> route groups, you can take advantage of having a single route list and a
> single set of route patterns.  You define which route group to use in the
> device pool (this is specific to call manager 7).  So, if i set the masking
> on the pattern, I still have the same problem of not being able to set
> multiple masks for different groups of phones easily.  The only way I can
> see to do it is to set a mask on each individual phone.  I don't want to do
> that.  If this doesn't pan out, I'll have to go back to the traditional way
> of doing route groups.  Any other suggestions?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Ward" <chrward at cisco.com>
> To: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 10:44:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID
>
> Hi Damien,
>
> It sounds like you want to be masking the calling party at the route
> pattern level with no modification at the route list level. I think I might
> not be understanding you exact scenario and goal, but that’s what it sounds
> like.
>
> Chris Ward
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
> *Date: *Fri, 1 May 2009 10:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
> *To: *<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Subject: *[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID
>
> I'm looking at using local route groups with my call system.  I am
> currently masking the calling party information at the Route List.  The
> reason for this is that I'm not mapping DIDs to individual phones, but I
> have all calls from a specific site masked as one telephone number (which
> dials back into the receptionist or UC call handler).  If i'm using one
> global route list, is there a way to preserve this configuration or is it a
> lost cause?  I'm using Call manager 7.0.2 and Unity Connection 7.0.2.  I am
> routing these calls through 2 PRIs (each in different calling areas with
> different providers).
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090501/e7131dd6/attachment.html>