[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID
Ryan Ratliff
rratliff at cisco.com
Fri May 1 11:34:53 EDT 2009
You also have the calling party transformations on the gateway itself
that can be used.
-Ryan
On May 1, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Scott Voll wrote:
Easiest way would be do it on the phones themselves via BAT.
are the GW's H323? could do it at the VGW end.
Scott
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us> wrote:
Yeah, I don't think that will work. From what I understand of local
route groups, you can take advantage of having a single route list
and a single set of route patterns. You define which route group to
use in the device pool (this is specific to call manager 7). So, if
i set the masking on the pattern, I still have the same problem of
not being able to set multiple masks for different groups of phones
easily. The only way I can see to do it is to set a mask on each
individual phone. I don't want to do that. If this doesn't pan out,
I'll have to go back to the traditional way of doing route groups.
Any other suggestions?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Ward" <chrward at cisco.com>
To: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 10:44:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID
Hi Damien,
It sounds like you want to be masking the calling party at the route
pattern level with no modification at the route list level. I think I
might not be understanding you exact scenario and goal, but that’s
what it sounds like.
Chris Ward
From: Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID
I'm looking at using local route groups with my call system. I am
currently masking the calling party information at the Route List.
The reason for this is that I'm not mapping DIDs to individual
phones, but I have all calls from a specific site masked as one
telephone number (which dials back into the receptionist or UC call
handler). If i'm using one global route list, is there a way to
preserve this configuration or is it a lost cause? I'm using Call
manager 7.0.2 and Unity Connection 7.0.2. I am routing these calls
through 2 PRIs (each in different calling areas with different
providers).
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list