[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

[Damien Ball]

I thought about that, but I wasn't sure how to apply them.  I will look into using this if it will do what I need.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
Cc: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 11:34:53 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

You also have the calling party transformations on the gateway itself  
that can be used.

-Ryan

On May 1, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Scott Voll wrote:

Easiest way would be do it on the phones themselves via BAT.

are the GW's H323?  could do it at the VGW end.

Scott

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us> wrote:
Yeah, I don't think that will work.  From what I understand of local  
route groups, you can take advantage of having a single route list  
and a single set of route patterns.  You define which route group to  
use in the device pool (this is specific to call manager 7).  So, if  
i set the masking on the pattern, I still have the same problem of  
not being able to set multiple masks for different groups of phones  
easily.  The only way I can see to do it is to set a mask on each  
individual phone.  I don't want to do that.  If this doesn't pan out,  
I'll have to go back to the traditional way of doing route groups.   
Any other suggestions?



----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Ward" <chrward at cisco.com>
To: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 10:44:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

Hi Damien,

It sounds like you want to be masking the calling party at the route  
pattern level with no modification at the route list level. I think I  
might not be understanding you exact scenario and goal, but that’s  
what it sounds like.

Chris Ward

From: Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

I'm looking at using local route groups with my call system.  I am  
currently masking the calling party information at the Route List.   
The reason for this is that I'm not mapping DIDs to individual  
phones, but I have all calls from a specific site masked as one  
telephone number (which dials back into the receptionist or UC call  
handler).  If i'm using one global route list, is there a way to  
preserve this configuration or is it a lost cause?  I'm using Call  
manager 7.0.2 and Unity Connection 7.0.2.  I am routing these calls  
through 2 PRIs (each in different calling areas with different  
providers).



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip