[cisco-voip] IPIPGW

[VoiceNoob]

CUBE is not in IPVOICE image. If you are going to use it buy it.

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:15 AM
To: Ali El Moussaoui
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IPIPGW

 

Cisco will start enforcing CUBE licensing in the newer 2900/3900 routers and
IOS 15.

 

On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:





I was told that i need a feature license to do the CUBE (IPIPGW) setup is
that true? 

Cant i load a an IPVOICE image and just use the feature?

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:

It sounded like you were connecting an E1 to a TDM device and trunking IP
upstream.  If you're running like-for-like codecs and you're 100% IP then
you don't need a PVDM module. 

 

On Nov 22, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:





thanks for your answers I think Nicks answer is the one am looking for since
i am doing H323-H323 no need for DSPs. 

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com> wrote:

More importantly - if you're not transcoding, you don't need the PVDM
at all for an IPIPGW.  Be sure that we're talking about a SIP-SIP,
SIP-H323, or H323-H323 connection when you say IPIPGW, which I'm
assuming is correct here.  No voice termination, transcoding, or
conferencing?  Don't need DSPs.

-nick


On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:
> PVDM2-64 will handle 32 G729 medium complexity calls.  PVDM2-32 will
handle 16.  PVDM2-16 will handle 8.  You get the idea.
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:
>
>> Hello Group,
>>
>> I am a silent watcher and this is my first post. I am planning a setup
for an IPIPGW. The requirements state that the gteway must handle a full E1.
My question is: how many PVDM2-64 I need? 1 or 2? note that i will be using
G729 (medium complexity).
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ali
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091125/4be03167/attachment.html>