[cisco-voip] IPIPGW

[Mark Holloway]

Cisco will start enforcing CUBE licensing in the newer 2900/3900 routers and IOS 15.

On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:

> I was told that i need a feature license to do the CUBE (IPIPGW) setup is that true?
> Cant i load a an IPVOICE image and just use the feature?
> 
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:
> It sounded like you were connecting an E1 to a TDM device and trunking IP upstream.  If you're running like-for-like codecs and you're 100% IP then you don't need a PVDM module.
> 
> On Nov 22, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:
> 
>> thanks for your answers I think Nicks answer is the one am looking for since i am doing H323-H323 no need for DSPs. 
>> 
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com> wrote:
>> More importantly - if you're not transcoding, you don't need the PVDM
>> at all for an IPIPGW.  Be sure that we're talking about a SIP-SIP,
>> SIP-H323, or H323-H323 connection when you say IPIPGW, which I'm
>> assuming is correct here.  No voice termination, transcoding, or
>> conferencing?  Don't need DSPs.
>> 
>> -nick
>> 
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:
>> > PVDM2-64 will handle 32 G729 medium complexity calls.  PVDM2-32 will handle 16.  PVDM2-16 will handle 8.  You get the idea.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello Group,
>> >>
>> >> I am a silent watcher and this is my first post. I am planning a setup for an IPIPGW. The requirements state that the gteway must handle a full E1. My question is: how many PVDM2-64 I need? 1 or 2? note that i will be using G729 (medium complexity).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Ali
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091125/37f9b5b8/attachment.html>