[cisco-voip] IPIPGW

[Nick Matthews]

Checked on this regarding license enforcement - from the information I
have this isn't true.  There is a roadmap for enforcement, but it
isn't starting at 15.0 or on the G2 boxes.

-nick

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:
> Cisco will start enforcing CUBE licensing in the newer 2900/3900 routers and
> IOS 15.
> On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:
>
> I was told that i need a feature license to do the CUBE (IPIPGW) setup is
> that true?
> Cant i load a an IPVOICE image and just use the feature?
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:
>>
>> It sounded like you were connecting an E1 to a TDM device and trunking IP
>> upstream.  If you're running like-for-like codecs and you're 100% IP then
>> you don't need a PVDM module.
>> On Nov 22, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:
>>
>> thanks for your answers I think Nicks answer is the one am looking for
>> since i am doing H323-H323 no need for DSPs.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> More importantly - if you're not transcoding, you don't need the PVDM
>>> at all for an IPIPGW.  Be sure that we're talking about a SIP-SIP,
>>> SIP-H323, or H323-H323 connection when you say IPIPGW, which I'm
>>> assuming is correct here.  No voice termination, transcoding, or
>>> conferencing?  Don't need DSPs.
>>>
>>> -nick
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > PVDM2-64 will handle 32 G729 medium complexity calls.  PVDM2-32 will
>>> > handle 16.  PVDM2-16 will handle 8.  You get the idea.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hello Group,
>>> >>
>>> >> I am a silent watcher and this is my first post. I am planning a setup
>>> >> for an IPIPGW. The requirements state that the gteway must handle a full E1.
>>> >> My question is: how many PVDM2-64 I need? 1 or 2? note that i will be using
>>> >> G729 (medium complexity).
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Ali
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>