[cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk

[Wes Sisk]

Busted.  I was not completely forthcoming with the rest of the 
communication:  "CCBU/UCBU have a variant that is still 2 CPU."
CCBU is basically all contact center products UCCX, UCCE, IP-IVR, etc. 
UCBU is Unity, Unity Connection meetingplace, CUPS, CUMA

/Wes

On Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:13:21 PM, Subhrojyoti Banerjee 
<subhrojyoti at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Wes,
>
> I posted the same question today, but had another related query. 
> Although it's pretty interesting fact, but it's a bit in contradiction 
> to what has been said about this before. This concept comes up in the 
> UCCE 7.5 BOM, where it says-
>
> *********(Pg 12)***********************
> Central Processing Unit
> Each individual core in a multi-core processor does not count as a 
> processor towards server requirements given in Appendix A – Server 
> Classes. A processor is considered a single physical CPU, regardless 
> of the number of cores.
>
> ***************************************
>
> But if a single E5540 processor quad core Nehalem processor can 
> function as a "7845" equivalent - with the number of supported phones 
> in line with the 7845 figures (of course with 4+GB and 4 x 140GB 
> drives), then that's a competitive piece of hardware. What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Subhrojyoti
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:58:03 -0400
> From: lelio at uoguelph.ca
> To: wsisk at cisco.com
> CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
>
> that's kinda cool. save the cost of a CPU. should make the total cost 
> a bit cheaper.
>
> i guess UCCE, Connection, etc, require the additional quad core CPU to 
> sustain the higher device loads.
>
> thanks for chiming in. ;)
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 5:52:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk
>
> Confirmed, it is a single quad core instead of 2 dual cores.  
> Intentional and by design.
>
> /Wes
>
> On Monday, October 05, 2009 5:32:03 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
> <lelio at uoguelph.ca> <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
>     hoping the cisco folk can chime in here...the latest swonly specs
>     for the HP servers show that the 7845 equivalent (not really, but
>     the one that serves 7500 units) is only one CPU, unlike the high
>     availability servers for connection which has two CPUs.
>
>     was there an error in the docs or is the 7500 device server really
>     only one CPU?
>
>     i'm hoping some internal training reflects the correct stats.
>
>
>     ---
>     Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>     Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>     (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>     "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     cisco-voip mailing list
>     cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>       
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091007/0680fcc7/attachment.html>