[cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Interesting. Back to CUCM...the price list references GL380 single CPU and dual CPU for prices, basically about double the cost. I guess they will have to modify this for the G6 to say 2.0Ghz and 2.5 Ghz. 



--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com> 
To: "Subhrojyoti Banerjee" <subhrojyoti at hotmail.com> 
Cc: lelio at uoguelph.ca, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 9:29:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk 

Busted. I was not completely forthcoming with the rest of the communication: "CCBU/UCBU have a variant that is still 2 CPU." 
CCBU is basically all contact center products UCCX, UCCE, IP-IVR, etc. UCBU is Unity, Unity Connection meetingplace, CUPS, CUMA 

/Wes 

On Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:13:21 PM, Subhrojyoti Banerjee <subhrojyoti at hotmail.com> wrote: 



Hi Wes, 

I posted the same question today, but had another related query. Although it's pretty interesting fact, but it's a bit in contradiction to what has been said about this before. This concept comes up in the UCCE 7.5 BOM, where it says- 

*********(Pg 12)*********************** 
Central Processing Unit 
Each individual core in a multi-core processor does not count as a processor towards server requirements given in Appendix A – Server Classes. A processor is considered a single physical CPU, regardless of the number of cores. 

*************************************** 

But if a single E5540 processor quad core Nehalem processor can function as a "7845" equivalent - with the number of supported phones in line with the 7845 figures (of course with 4+GB and 4 x 140GB drives), then that's a competitive piece of hardware. What do you think? 

Thanks, 
Subhrojyoti 




Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:58:03 -0400 
From: lelio at uoguelph.ca 
To: wsisk at cisco.com 
CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk 


that's kinda cool. save the cost of a CPU. should make the total cost a bit cheaper. 

i guess UCCE, Connection, etc, require the additional quad core CPU to sustain the higher device loads. 

thanks for chiming in. ;) 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 5:52:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] another question for the cisco folk 

Confirmed, it is a single quad core instead of 2 dual cores. Intentional and by design. 

/Wes 

On Monday, October 05, 2009 5:32:03 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote: 



hoping the cisco folk can chime in here...the latest swonly specs for the HP servers show that the 7845 equivalent (not really, but the one that serves 7500 units) is only one CPU, unlike the high availability servers for connection which has two CPUs. 

was there an error in the docs or is the 7500 device server really only one CPU? 

i'm hoping some internal training reflects the correct stats. 


--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091007/5574b743/attachment.html>