[cisco-voip] TEHO legals and CLID

[Tired Banchini]

I am in UK, but reviewing global dial plan covering all major continents....


I had thought ASIA PAC may have some restrictions...

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com> wrote:

>  What country are you in? In the US you can do TEHO all day long.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Tired Banchini
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:39 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] TEHO legals and CLID
>
>
>
> Hi everyone.
>
> I was wondering if anyone can advise or point me in the direction of some
> authoritative documentation on the legal implications of TEHO, if any... in
> global context, or at least with major continents?
>
> My loose understanding as this all on-net (intra-company) calls are legal;
> must admit I get conflicting opinions, although majority suggest this is OK.
> In terms of TEHO, i.e. break out, opinion seems a little more blurred... is
> there any authoritive references on this anyone can advise of?
>
> Also again my experience limited in this field, in the same context, TEHO
> and CLID. I would kind of anticipate th
>
> at large carriers would expect to see specific DDI ranges or routes as CLID
> on access truunks into there cloud and hence will block numbers that don't
> match the expected CLIDs, I have seen this with some SPs, again I am not
> sure if this is just a loose best practice or where it becomes mandatory....
> can anyone offer any worldly advice please....?
>
> Thanks in advance
> TB
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091008/409b097b/attachment.html>