[cisco-voip] QoS for Day to Day traffic

Kevin Dunn cheesevoice at gmail.com
Mon Oct 12 12:15:23 EDT 2009


AHHHHHHH (light bulb moment)

by matching ACL 101 I am putting everything BUT 10.31.0.0 traffic in the
day2day class, and then everythign else would be in default class...  very
awesome.

and THAT is why I ask, because sometimes, you just don't think the way
everyone else does.

Thank you all very much.

Kevin

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Brantley Richbourg <
Brantley.Richbourg at mmicnc.com> wrote:

>  Hello,
>
> I have some thoughts on your policy-map.
>
> You are not going to get 8 Mbps on your day2day class.  First off, you give
> 3% priority to voice, which leaves 97Mbps remaining.  The next class  in
> your policy-map (DR) is saying to use 89% of the *remaining* 97Mbps
> (84.39Mbps), and finally you have day2day traffic can have 8% of the *
> remaining* BW.  So your DR replication I assume will be using a good bit
> of bandwidth all day long, so you are only going to get 157Kbps for DR
> traffic (if DR and Voice are using 100% of what they can get), because the
> "remaining" keyword tells the IOS to allocate that percentage of bandwidth
> that has *not* been allocated to other classes.  I would do this:
>
>  policy-map DRandVoice
>  class voice
>   priority percent 3
>  class day2day
>   bandwidth percent 8
>
> Your DR traffic will hit the "class-default" will be get the rest of the
> pipe if both classes are being matched on.  That will give you 89% for DR,
> 8% for day2day and 3% for voice (LLQ).
>
> More information here:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk757/technologies_tech_note09186a0080103eae.shtml#summaryofdifferences
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brantley
>
>   *Brantley Richbourg, MCSE, CCNAS, VCP*
> Network Engineer
> Medical Mutual Insurance Company of North Carolina
> 919.878.7564
> 919.878.7550 (F)
> Brantley.Richbourg at mmicnc.com
> www.medicalmutualgroup.com
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Kevin Dunn
> *Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2009 10:41 AM
> *To:* Cisco Voice
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] QoS for Day to Day traffic
>
>    Hello my Pundits
>
> I have a 100Meg Ethernet WAN connection between two towns for DR purposes,
> and we are going to run "day to day" traffic (voice and data) over this
> circuit as well, now when replication and SAN to SAN traffic hits I don't
> want it to mess with the "day to day" traffic.   The DR traffic will either
> source or destination to 10.31.0.0.  So I made a couple of ACL's to match
> that IP to.  The end result is I want to voice traffic to have priority and
> 3Megs of bandwidth, Day to Day traffic around 8 Megs of traffic and DR (San
> to San) the remaining 89%....
>
> 1.  Do you think this will work?
> 2.  Do you think it is set up right?
>
>
>
> class-map match-any voice
>  match  dscp ef
>  match protocol rtp audio
> class-map match-any DR
>  match access-group 100
> class-map match-any day2day
>  match access-group 101
>
> policy-map DRandVoice
>  class voice
>   priority percent 3
>  class DR
>   bandwidth remaining percent 89
>  class day2day
>   bandwidth remaining percent 8
>
> access-list 100 permit ip 10.31.0.0 0.0.255.255
> access-list 101 deny ip 10.31.0.0 0.0.255.255
> access-list 101 permit ip any any
>
>
>
> *Kevin Dunn*
> *Marathon Cheese Corporation*
>
>
> Confidentiality: The information in this electronic mail may contain
> confidential, sensitive and/or protected health information intended only
> for the addressee(s). Any other person, including anyone who believes he/she
> might have received it due to an addressing error, is requested to notify
> this sender immediately by return e-mail, and shall delete it without
> further reading and retention. The information shall not be forwarded or
> shared unless in compliance with MMIC policies on confidentiality, and/or
> the written permission of this sender.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091012/95762005/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list