[cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4?
Jeff Ruttman
ruttmanj at carewisc.org
Wed Sep 2 12:52:25 EDT 2009
Greetings,
I'm on 6.1.2, and I have to upgrade if I'm to patch the DST problem that
will affect lots of my phones. I think I would have chosen 6.1.3b(SU1)
over 6.1.3b.
However, as to upgrade paths, I think I have my facts straight. (Feel
free to correct me.)
6.1.2 can go directly to 6.1.3b
6.1.2 cannot go directly to 6.1.3b(SU1) or to 6.1.4
Today I discovered there is a 6.1.4(SU1) out and you CAN go directly to
it from 6.1(2x) says the readme.
So I think my choice will be 6.1.4(SU1). I'm not really a "latest and
greatest" kind of fellow, but this choice at least keeps my very stable
6.2.1 version intact on the inactive partition just in case whereas a
"double" upgrade to 6.1.3b(SU1) or 6.1.4 would not.
Thanks
jeff
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Leetun, Rob
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:39 AM
To: Ed Leatherman; Wes Sisk
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4?
Would you guys upgrade from 6.1.2 to 6.1.3?
Cheers
Rob
Robert Leetun
Network Engineer
Boulder County Information Technology
2025 14th Street
Boulder, CO 80302
303 441-3866 (W)
303 441-3983 (F)
rleetun at bouldercounty.org <mailto:arees at bouldercounty.org>
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 6:36 AM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4?
If I were specifically going for a particular fix and nothing else, i
would prefer the "minimal set" to try and minimize the risk of
introducing a new bug or problem. That said, if I had a problem and TAC
told me I had to upgrade to 6.1.4, I wouldn't be upset about it.. just
wouldn't be my preference. I would grouse about it later if I ran into a
new bug ;)
As far as the original post, if it's a new install/upgrade from 4 or 5,
I would probably load 6.1.4. That said, we're on 6.1.3 right now and
don't plan on upgrading any further in that 6.x train, next upgrade will
be 7.x most likely for a time of day routing with unified mobility.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
IMHO this is very critical. If you come to me for support I cannot give
you a "minimal set" change between where you are and where the fix is
available. You are going to get all of the changes from 6.1.3 to 6.1.4
in addition to any new fix that is tailored to your environment. I may
be a bit biased as my business leads me to expect things to be broken.
To that end it appears prudent to get as close as possible to any
patches that may be necessary.
I would very much like to hear the positions of others.
/Wes
On Tuesday, September 01, 2009 9:25:24 AM , Lelio Fulgenzi
<lelio at uoguelph.ca> <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
Ah, yes, that's another way to look at it. As each dot.dot release is
released, the previous likely gets shelved for development.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com> <mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>
To: "STEVEN CASPER" <SCASPER at mtb.com> <mailto:SCASPER at mtb.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, lelio at uoguelph.ca
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2009 9:04:59 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4?
6.1(3) is "done" meaning no more ES will be built for it. If you upgrade
to 6.1.3 and encounter a serious issue Cisco will require you to upgrade
to 6.1.4 or an engineering special of 6.1.4 to get a fix.
net: 6.1(4) is the "best" place to be currently.
/Wes
On Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:18:50 AM , STEVEN CASPER
<SCASPER at mtb.com> <mailto:SCASPER at mtb.com> wrote:
I believe 6.1.4 fixes the Denial of Service vulnerabilities recently
reported.
Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca> 08/31/09 11:25 PM >>>
Not easy, but necessary. Even taking a look at SEV 1/2 bugs should be
enough. Also, my understanding is that ES's are no longer what ES's were
in the days of 3.x and 4.x (possibly 5.x). They're not built for
individual customers like they used to be, but essentially, they are
what service packs used to be. Granted they're not published for some
reason.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brandon Phelps" <btphelps at atomicnets.com>
<mailto:btphelps at atomicnets.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 10:00:28 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4?
meh, thats easy to do. Looking more for opinions and anecdotes.
Would most people install an ES without having a specific reason for
doing so?
B
Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
I think you'll hear from Cisco TAC over and over, always use the
latest
version and the latest ES. Nowadays, especially from x.x.3 to
x.x.4 it's
not feature enhancements but bug fixes mostly. Or so we're told.
Take a
look at the bug list, see if there are any that stand out and
not work
for you.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brandon Phelps" <btphelps at atomicnets.com>
<mailto:btphelps at atomicnets.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 8:35:38 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4?
Which one is more stable?
CUCM 6.1.3 or 6.1.4?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
<http://portal.mxlogic.com/redir/?5eXz2bObWbNJeXzbxEVLtxcSjDdqymoIToHMd9
_7wrwCHIcfBisEeROQGmGncRAIrLRXFLELf6zB5MTsTqlblbCqOmbAaJMJZ0kIToHMd9_7wq
rjKVtASyC-yYqenQQjhOrvhdwLQzh0qmXiFqFsPmiNFtd40BFVVEwtH4QglmB2lok11EwsV7
Cjh1m9EwsV7C2hKvxYY1NJ4S-rjKUOUqerTopdS9Lq>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
<http://portal.mxlogic.com/redir/?5eXz2bObWbNJeXzbxEVLtxcSjDdqymoIToHMd9
_7wrwCHIcfBisEeROQGmGncRAIrLRXFLELf6zB5MTsTqlblbCqOmbAaJMJZ0kIToHMd9_7wq
rjKVtASyC-yYqenQQjhOrvhdwLQzh0qmXiFqFsPmiNFtd40BFVVEwtH4QglmB2lok11EwsV7
Cjh1m9EwsV7C2hKvxYY1NJcS-rjKUOUqerTopdS9Lq>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
<http://portal.mxlogic.com/redir/?5eXz2bObWbNJeXzbxEVLtxcSjDdqymoIToHMd9
_7wrwCHIcfBisEeROQGmGncRAIrLRXFLELf6zB5MTsTqlblbCqOmbAaJMJZ0kIToHMd9_7wq
rjKVtASyC-yYqenQQjhOrvhdwLQzh0qmXiFqFsPmiNFtd40BFVVEwtH4QglmB2lok11EwsV7
Cjh1m9EwsV7C2hKvxYY1NJAS-rjKUOUqerTopdS9Lq>
************************************
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that
is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from
disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information
contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in
error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may
contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the
restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information
for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are
receiving the information.
There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The
sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
************************************
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
<http://portal.mxlogic.com/redir/?5eXz2bObWbNJeXzbxEVLtxcSjDdqymoIToHMd9
_7wrwCHIcfBisEeROQGmGncRAIrLRXFLELf6zB5MTsTqlblbCqOmbAaJMJZ0kIToHMd9_7wq
rjKVtASyC-yYqenQQjhOrvhdwLQzh0qmXiFqFsPmiNFtd40BFVVEwtH4QglmB2lok11EwsV7
Cjh1m9EwsV7C2hKvxYY1NJwS-rjKUOUqerTopdS9Lq>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
<http://portal.mxlogic.com/redir/?5eXz2bObWbNJeXzbxEVLtxcSjDdqymoIToHMd9
_7wrwCHIcfBisEeROQGmGncRAIrLRXFLELf6zB5MTsTqlblbCqOmbAaJMJZ0kIToHMd9_7wq
rjKVtASyC-yYqenQQjhOrvhdwLQzh0qmXiFqFsPmiNFtd40BFVVEwtH4QglmB2lok11EwsV7
Cjh1m9EwsV7C2hKvxYY1NJYS-rjKUOUqerTopdS9Lq>
--
Ed Leatherman
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email including attachments is intended for the specific delivery to and use by the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and includes information which should be considered as private and confidential. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please reply to the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090902/7ad13e4d/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list