[cisco-voip] FAC

Lelio Fulgenzi lelio at uoguelph.ca
Fri Sep 11 10:35:38 EDT 2009


I would recommend against that. If you search the archives, you will see plenty of options. 

My route (no pun intended) was to add a delay after 911 to avoid misdials. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "kurakani" <kurakani at yahoo.com> 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 10:21:59 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [cisco-voip] FAC 

I am experiencing frequent 911 calls made by users and want to control it. Would it be a good idea to do it by using Forced Authorizatoin Code (FAC) in the route pattern for 911 calls? 

Thanks 





_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090911/f75aa3cd/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list