[cisco-voip] FAC
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Fri Sep 11 10:35:38 EDT 2009
I would recommend against that. If you search the archives, you will see plenty of options.
My route (no pun intended) was to add a delay after 911 to avoid misdials.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "kurakani" <kurakani at yahoo.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 10:21:59 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] FAC
I am experiencing frequent 911 calls made by users and want to control it. Would it be a good idea to do it by using Forced Authorizatoin Code (FAC) in the route pattern for 911 calls?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090911/f75aa3cd/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list