[cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
Mathew Miller
miller.mathew at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 18:32:33 EDT 2009
You need a 3rd party app called mwi 2007 from geomant http://www.mwi2007.com/
to make it work.
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:22 PM, Fuermann, Jason wrote:
> MWI doesn’t work with 7, but is supposed to with 10. We buy a set
> number of tickets that we can open with our licensing. We haven’t
> had to use any of them yet, but we are a pretty competent shop.
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rossella Mariotti-Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:30 PM
> To: Scott Voll
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
> Scott, would MWI work with Exchange 7 or would you need a third
> party app to make it work?
> What kind of support contract do you have with MS? As far as my
> group knows here every time we had trouble and we had to call it was
> for a fee and the tech support wasn’t the best either, with Cisco we
> have 24x7 and matters do get resolved quickly.
>
> rossella mariotti-jones | network analyst | chemeketa community
> college | rossella.mariotti.jones at chemeketa.edu | 503-589-7775
> to reduce waste, please consider not printing this email unless
> necessary
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 1:19 PM
> To: Voice Noob
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
> We are also evaluating jumping ship from Unity UM to Exchange 2k7.
> The smartnet + UCCS subscriptions are to much......... for a product
> (Voice Mail) that shouldn't cost 1/2 what it does.
>
> I had a conversation with the Unity PM and BU about it......... I
> don't think they knew what to say.
>
> with a SLA from M$ it doesn't make sense to stay with ci$co for UM.
> and if exchange 2k10 has call handlers.......... we will move no
> question.
>
> Scott
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Guys at some point soon I have to believe that connection will be
> just as good as Unity is now with the tie into the exchange store.
> Everyone knows how bad integrated is compared to Unified. You have
> to assume that they are not going to let MS beat them on this and
> will have a way that the voicemails are stored in exchange. I would
> suggest you evaluate your decision thoroughly before making a jump
> like that.
>
>
>
> From: Nate VanMaren [mailto:VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:43 PM
> To: Voice Noob; 'Eric Isakson'; 'Lelio Fulgenzi'
>
>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
> We and BYU both are on Exchange 2007 UM, they migrated from Unity
> while we are migrating from Octel.
>
>
>
> The short answer really is, if you want Unified Messaging you’re
> only strategic answer is Microsoft. If you’re ok with Integrated
> Messaging, then you can settle for Unity Connection or Unity Express.
>
>
>
> I’ve had quite a few conversations with people at Cisco about Unity
> and Microsoft Exchange UM. Exchange UM surprised everyone that is
> was so good it’s first release. And while they may say they are not
> abandoning Unity, that doesn’t mean that it will stay or even become
> current with features. Just like the 2nd Gen IP Phones, the
> 7940/7960. I believe the main reason these are still sold is
> because they would make way too many people upset when they say, oh
> these are now EOS and you have 5 years support left for them.
>
>
>
> We’re doing Unity Express or connection in the field because we
> don’t have local mail stores; and most of these aren’t even doing
> integrated messaging they’re just voicemail, because Integrated
> messaging is so much harder to deal with than unified messaging.
>
>
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> -Nate
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voice Noob
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:30 PM
> To: 'Eric Isakson'; 'Lelio Fulgenzi'
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> Why is it a bad decision? What would cause you to drop connection
> completely?
>
>
>
> From: Eric Isakson [mailto:eric.isakson at ogdenclinic.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:24 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi; Voice Noob
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> I’m fairly certain that they announced that Unity 8 will be the last
> version of Unity. After that, it will be Unity Connection or Unity
> Express. This is what we were told by Cisco reps at a recent Tech
> Day here in Utah. Our partners have verified the same.
>
>
>
> We see this as a bad decision and will probably result in our moving
> to Exchange for voice messaging and such once MS catches up or comes
> closer with features.
>
>
>
> Eric Isakson | Network Engineer | Information Technology Dept. |
> Ogden Clinic | eric.isakson at ogdenclinic.com | 801.475.3572
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:03 PM
> To: Voice Noob
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> I got a similar "feeling" from a few conferences I attended. They're
> not going to discontinue or stop developing Unity, but I think the
> bulk of effort will be into Unity Connection. For example, you'll
> likely see features in Unity Connection first, then ported to Unity.
> Of course, none of this can be verified or confirmed and can change
> on the drop of a dime, just like other things.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Voice Noob" <voicenoob at gmail.com>
> To: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>,
> "Cristobal Priego" <cristobalpriego at gmail.com>, "Rossella Mariotti-
> Jones" <rossella.mariotti.jones at chemeketa.edu>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:42:01 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
> Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
> Until they get feature parity with Unity I don’t think they will stop.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 1:35 PM
> To: Cristobal Priego; Rossella Mariotti-Jones
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> Unity 8 is coming, there is a beta going on now and per a post on
> the NetPro forums it will have new features
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast
> assistance!
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:20 PM
> To: Rossella Mariotti-Jones
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> as far as I know the development for Unity is going to stop with
> version 7.X . all the efforts are focused on unity connection
>
> maybe i'm wrong, but that's what i know.
>
> 2009/9/11 Rossella Mariotti-Jones <rossella.mariotti.jones at chemeketa.edu
> >
>
> Currently we use Microsoft Exchange 2003 with Cisco Unity version 5.0
> (1) and there is talk in our organization to upgrade to Exchange
> 2010 next year, I see Unity 7 supports Exchange 2007 but I can’t
> find anything about Exchange 2010, is this possible? Does anyone
> know anything about it? Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> rossella
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing
> list cisco-voip at puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/
> listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
> intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone
> else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized
> addressee, is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient,
> any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken
> in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
> believe that you have received this email in error, please contact
> the sender, delete this email, and destroy all copies.
>
>
>
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
> the original message.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090915/dbb6326d/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list