[cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010

Tue Sep 15 18:32:33 EDT 2009

You need a 3rd party app called mwi 2007 from geomant http://www.mwi2007.com/ 
  to make it work.

On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:22 PM, Fuermann, Jason wrote:

> MWI doesn’t work with 7, but is supposed to with 10.  We buy a set  
> number of tickets that we can open with our licensing. We haven’t  
> had to use any of them yet, but we are a pretty competent shop.
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rossella Mariotti-Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:30 PM
> To: Scott Voll
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
> Scott, would MWI work with Exchange 7 or would you need a third  
> party app to make it work?
> What kind of support contract do you have with MS? As far as my  
> group knows here every time we had trouble and we had to call it was  
> for a fee and the tech support wasn’t the best either, with Cisco we  
> have 24x7 and matters do get resolved quickly.
>
> rossella mariotti-jones | network analyst | chemeketa community  
> college | rossella.mariotti.jones at chemeketa.edu | 503-589-7775
> to reduce waste, please consider not printing this email unless  
> necessary
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 1:19 PM
> To: Voice Noob
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
> We are also evaluating jumping ship from Unity UM to Exchange 2k7.   
> The smartnet + UCCS subscriptions are to much......... for a product  
> (Voice Mail) that shouldn't cost 1/2 what it does.
>
> I had a conversation with the Unity PM and BU about it......... I  
> don't think they knew what to say.
>
> with a SLA from M$ it doesn't make sense to stay with ci$co for UM.   
> and if exchange 2k10 has call handlers.......... we will move no  
> question.
>
> Scott
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
> Guys at some point soon I have to believe that connection will be  
> just as good as Unity is now with the tie into the exchange store.  
> Everyone knows how bad integrated is compared to Unified. You have  
> to assume that they are not going to let MS beat them on this and  
> will have a way that the voicemails are stored in exchange. I would  
> suggest you evaluate your decision thoroughly before making a jump  
> like that.
>
>
>
> From: Nate VanMaren [mailto:VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:43 PM
> To: Voice Noob; 'Eric Isakson'; 'Lelio Fulgenzi'
>
>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
> We and BYU both are on Exchange 2007 UM, they migrated from Unity  
> while we are migrating from Octel.
>
>
>
> The short answer really is, if you want Unified Messaging you’re  
> only strategic answer is Microsoft.  If you’re ok with Integrated  
> Messaging, then you can settle for Unity Connection or Unity Express.
>
>
>
> I’ve had quite a few conversations with people at Cisco about Unity  
> and Microsoft Exchange UM.  Exchange UM surprised everyone that is  
> was so good it’s first release.  And while they may say they are not  
> abandoning Unity, that doesn’t mean that it will stay or even become  
> current with features.  Just like the 2nd Gen IP Phones, the  
> 7940/7960.  I believe the main reason these are still sold is  
> because they would make way too many people upset when they say, oh  
> these are now EOS and you have 5 years support left for them.
>
>
>
> We’re doing Unity Express  or connection in the field because we  
> don’t have local mail stores; and most of these aren’t even doing  
> integrated messaging they’re just voicemail, because Integrated  
> messaging is so much harder to deal with than unified messaging.
>
>
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> -Nate
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voice Noob
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:30 PM
> To: 'Eric Isakson'; 'Lelio Fulgenzi'
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> Why is it a bad decision? What would cause you to drop connection  
> completely?
>
>
>
> From: Eric Isakson [mailto:eric.isakson at ogdenclinic.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:24 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi; Voice Noob
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> I’m fairly certain that they announced that Unity 8 will be the last  
> version of Unity.  After that, it will be Unity Connection or Unity  
> Express.  This is what we were told by Cisco reps at a recent Tech  
> Day here in Utah.  Our partners have verified the same.
>
>
>
> We see this as a bad decision and will probably result in our moving  
> to Exchange for voice messaging and such once MS catches up or comes  
> closer with features.
>
>
>
> Eric Isakson | Network Engineer | Information Technology Dept. |  
> Ogden Clinic | eric.isakson at ogdenclinic.com | 801.475.3572
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:03 PM
> To: Voice Noob
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> I got a similar "feeling" from a few conferences I attended. They're  
> not going to discontinue or stop developing Unity, but I think the  
> bulk of effort will be into Unity Connection. For example, you'll  
> likely see features in Unity Connection first, then ported to Unity.  
> Of course, none of this can be verified or confirmed and can change  
> on the drop of a dime, just like other things.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Voice Noob" <voicenoob at gmail.com>
> To: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>,  
> "Cristobal Priego" <cristobalpriego at gmail.com>, "Rossella Mariotti- 
> Jones" <rossella.mariotti.jones at chemeketa.edu>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:42:01 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada  
> Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
> Until they get feature parity with Unity I don’t think they will stop.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 1:35 PM
> To: Cristobal Priego; Rossella Mariotti-Jones
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> Unity 8 is coming, there is  a beta going on now and per a post on  
> the NetPro forums it will have new features
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Loraditch
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>
> Timonium, MD 21093
> support at heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com for fast  
> assistance!
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:20 PM
> To: Rossella Mariotti-Jones
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.0.1 and Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> as far as I know the development for Unity is going to stop with  
> version 7.X . all the efforts are focused on unity connection
>
> maybe i'm wrong, but that's what i know.
>
> 2009/9/11 Rossella Mariotti-Jones <rossella.mariotti.jones at chemeketa.edu 
> >
>
> Currently we use Microsoft Exchange 2003 with Cisco Unity version 5.0 
> (1) and there is talk in our organization to upgrade to Exchange  
> 2010 next year, I see Unity 7 supports Exchange 2007 but I can’t  
> find anything about Exchange 2010, is this possible? Does anyone  
> know anything about it? Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> rossella
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing  
> list cisco-voip at puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/ 
> listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is  
> intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this email by anyone  
> else, unless expressly approved by the sender or an authorized  
> addressee, is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient,  
> any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action omitted or taken  
> in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you  
> believe that you have received this email in error, please contact  
> the sender, delete this email, and destroy all copies.
>
>
>
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended  
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged  
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or  
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,  
> please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of  
> the original message.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090915/dbb6326d/attachment.html>