[cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
Fried Michael
Fried at Danfoss.com
Mon Sep 21 13:24:38 EDT 2009
We played with a similar setup for several months, the only way we could
get it to work was through a QSIG trunk between the MD-110 and Call
Manager.
Michael G. Fried
Direct Phone: +1 410-513-1193
Cell: +1 443-536-1858
Fax: +1 410-931-8256
E-mail: fried at danfoss.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 12:00 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 71, Issue 21
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Unity connection imap (Dane Newman)
2. Re: BackupActivated mesages showing up on Operations Manager
(Tim Smith)
3. Re: CME-Ericsson IP integration (???)
4. Cacti again... need to monitor B channels on a 2851
(Jonathan Charles)
5. Re: CME-Ericsson IP integration (Louis Koekemoer (ZA))
6. Re: CME-Ericsson IP integration (???)
7. Re: PRI Trunk Group H323 (RAWLE GORDON)
8. HP7835H2-2333 Issue (Samuel Womack)
9. Syslog Alert Message (Daniel)
10. CUPC users unable to authenticate (Daniel)
11. Connection Recorded Name Replication (STEVEN CASPER)
12. Re: Syslog Alert Message (Lelio Fulgenzi)
13. Position in Queue AND UCCX (Sechaba Mokoena)
14. Re: BackupActivated mesages showing up on Operations Manager
(Madziarczyk, Jonathan)
15. Re: Cisco's new download Java applet (Scott Voll)
16. Re: Connection Recorded Name Replication (Lelio Fulgenzi)
17. Re: Cacti again... need to monitor B channels on a 2851
(Scott Voll)
18. CUBE ringback problem (Brandon Phelps)
19. Re: Connection Recorded Name Replication (STEVEN CASPER)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:16:42 -0400
From: Dane Newman <dane.newman at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity connection imap
Message-ID:
<a54820e50909201016y177ec56eib5a1e83332ccd544 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Hello
I followed the quick steps below to enable users to be able to connect
via
imap port 143 to my unity connection server via outlook 2007.
I added the user to my outlook and tried to use the username and
password
but it keeps rejecting my password. I tried my phone pin and active
directory user password (since the user was synced via ldap) and still
does
not work it keeps rejecting me. I was curious if I had to do anything
else
*My environment: Unity Connection 7.0*
To enable IMAP access on Unity Connection, it is not as obvious as
expected,
because the setting is under the ?SMTP Configuration? session.
1. System Settings > SMTP Configuration > Server
2. On the Edit menu, click Search IP Address Access List
3. To add a new IP address to the list, click Add New
4. Enter * to allow all hosts. Of course you can make it more
restrictive
5. Save
6. Check the ?Allow Connection? checkbox, otherwise all hosts will be
rejected.
7. Save again.
8. Done. You can now use your mail client to access Unity Connection
mailbox
via IMAP. Make sure you have the IMAP license for your users otherwise
you
will not able to connect to CUC with IMAP.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090920/b45d2
e1e/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:23:38 +1000
From: Tim Smith <thsglobal at gmail.com>
To: "Madziarczyk, Jonathan" <JMad at cityofevanston.org>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] BackupActivated mesages showing up on
Operations Manager
Message-ID:
<202613020909201523n345fdd62r90818c90fbff63ca at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Managed state is referring to CUOM setting for that interface. Cant get
into
my CUOM this morning! But rough guestimate is below..
Go into your Service Level View, select your voice gateway, right click
it.
Either under detailed device view, or polling and thresholds, you can
list
the interfaces of the device.
On the right hand side, you will see the managed state (its either true
or
false) I guess according to that bug, you want to make sure you set all
your
b chans to false.
Cheers,
Tim.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Madziarczyk, Jonathan <
JMad at cityofevanston.org> wrote:
> So it?s and MGCP gateway?how do I check ?managed state??
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 18, 2009 9:49 AM
> *To:* Madziarczyk, Jonathan
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] BackupActivated mesages showing up on
> Operations Manager
>
>
>
> I've not touched it personally but from a colleague:
>
> "Check out CSCsi19137, perhaps the customer has the b-channels set to
a
> managed state. If so then that will cause this event, the b-channels
> should not be set to a managed state."
>
> CSCsi19137 focuses on a SIP gateway but the concept of managing
b-channels
> applies regardless of protocol.
>
> /Wes
>
> On Friday, September 18, 2009 9:52:08 AM, Madziarczyk, Jonathan
> <JMad at cityofevanston.org> <JMad at cityofevanston.org> wrote:
>
> I know this is a previous post but I?m not sure my problem is the
same.
>
>
>
> I?m getting the following message about 60 times a day (CUCM
6.1.3.3000-1
>
>
>
> Subject:
>
> 00001WN ; 10.20.20.9 ; Thu 17-Sep-2009 22:30:11 CDT ; Critical ;
> BackupActivated ; Active
>
>
>
> Message:
>
> EVENT ID = 00001XH
>
> ALERT ID = 00000S1
>
> TIME = Fri 18-Sep-2009 08:38:16 CDT
>
> STATUS = Active
>
> SEVERITY = Critical
>
> MANAGED OBJECT = 10.20.20.9
>
> MANAGED OBJECT TYPE = Routers
>
> EVENT DESCRIPTION = BackupActivated::Component=IF-10.20.20.9/106
>
[Se0/1/0:22];ComponentClass=Interface;ComponentEventCode=1008;Type=DS0;I
sFlapping=false;AdminStatus=UP;MaxSpeed=64000;OperStatus=UP;InterfaceCod
e=ISDNBCHANNEL;Mode=BACKUP;DuplexMode=FULLDUPLEX;LastChangedA
>
>
>
>
>
> When I do a sho ccm-manager I see that my primary is still the
Registered
> server and my First Backup is labeled ?Backup Ready?.
>
>
>
> I?ve tried physically restarting the gateway, as well as using the
CUCM
> interface on both the primary and the secondary to do a Reset.
>
>
>
> The only change I?ve made was to add the ?Display IE Delivery? in the
PRI
> Protocol Type Specific Information settings on one of the Ports.
>
>
>
> Ideas?
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cisco-voip mailing list
>
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/cd82f
0fe/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:43:18 +0900
From: ??? <sehsys at innet.co.kr>
To: "Louis Koekemoer \(ZA\)" <Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
Message-ID:
<BA745B94B7AA8B44A473D71BBA87E68D01739B52 at innet-ex.innet.co.kr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987"
Hi.
I have same problem. Have you get any solution?
If so, let me know that.
And, if I get any solution, I will give you that, too.
Good luck.
From: Aman Chugh [mailto:aman.chugh at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 9:48 PM
To: Louis Koekemoer (ZA)
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
I have not done it but to start with , try looking at the following.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/ns340/ns414/ns728/networking_soluti
ons_products_genericcontent0900aecd805b561d.html
There are several links for integration with Ericsson using CUCM with
QSIG, they should give configuration insights into Ericsson.
HTH
Aman
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Louis Koekemoer (ZA)
<Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com> wrote:
I have an issue at a customer. They have a CME on one site, and then a
Ericsson MD- 110 across the WAN, connected to a 1800 router. We have one
way speech. We decide to set this up in our lab, connecting the CME to
the Ericsson via an IP card. We have network connectivity. We can ping
the Ip address on the Ip card on the Ericsson. There is a dial-peer to
the Ericsson IP Card. When we make a call to the phone on the Ericsson,
it rings, and when you answer, the Cisco IP Phone keeps ringing. When we
dial from the Ericsson to the Cisco IP Phone, and you answer, you get
Tone-on-hold, without pushing hold or anything. Any suggestion or maybe
configs will be appreciated.
Regards
Louis Koekemoer
Cisco IPT Systems Engineer
Converged Communications
Dimension Data (South Africa)
Tel: +27 (11) 575 6560
Fax: +27 (11) 576 6560
Cell: +27 (71) 680 8790
Email: Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com
Cisco Global Technology Excellence Partner of the Year 2009 | Cisco
Global Enterprise Partner of the Year 2007
Cisco Unified Communications Partner of the Year 2008 | Cisco IP
Communications Partner of the Year 2002 - 2007
Cisco Emerging Markets Theatre Partner of the Year (Middle East &
Africa) 2008 | Cisco Africa, Enterprise Partner of the Year 2009
Cisco Africa, Solution Innovation Partner of the Year 2009 | Cisco South
Africa Gold Partner of the Year 2005 - 2007
For more information about Dimension Data, please go to
www.dimensiondata.com <http://www.dimensiondata.com/>
P Before printing this email please think about the environment
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer.htm"
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/6c38f
bde/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:44:02 -0500
From: Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cacti again... need to monitor B channels on a
2851
Message-ID:
<5d093f9a0909202144t6ff190dfk85e90e3f172cd5e5 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I have a customer with a 2851, running H.323 and three T1 PRIs and a
T1-CAS. They need to monitor all in-use B-channels and all DS0s on the
T1-CAS.
Every time I look for a way to do that, all the links point to E1s on an
AS5300.
Has anyone gotten this to work with a T1 PRI on an ISR? And if so, how?
Jonathan
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:39:43 +0200
From: "Louis Koekemoer (ZA)" <Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com>
To: ??? <sehsys at innet.co.kr>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
Message-ID: <Jl9Ssl4PXQmG at 4lJ9bd6b>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
So far it looks like the only solution is a Qsig trunk, as I thought.
Problem is that the MD110 requires an aditional E1 license. Let me know
if u find a solution.
--- original message ---
From: "???" <sehsys at innet.co.kr>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
Date: 21st September 2009
Time: 2:42:44 am
Hi.
I have same problem. Have you get any solution?
If so, let me know that.
And, if I get any solution, I will give you that, too.
Good luck.
From: Aman Chugh [mailto:aman.chugh at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 9:48 PM
To: Louis Koekemoer (ZA)
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
I have not done it but to start with , try looking at the following.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/ns340/ns414/ns728/networking_soluti
ons_products_genericcontent0900aecd805b561d.html
There are several links for integration with Ericsson using CUCM with
QSIG, they should give configuration insights into Ericsson.
HTH
Aman
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Louis Koekemoer (ZA)
<Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com<mailto:Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com>>
wrote:
I have an issue at a customer. They have a CME on one site, and then a
Ericsson MD- 110 across the WAN, connected to a 1800 router. We have one
way speech. We decide to set this up in our lab, connecting the CME to
the Ericsson via an IP card. We have network connectivity. We can ping
the Ip address on the Ip card on the Ericsson. There is a dial-peer to
the Ericsson IP Card. When we make a call to the phone on the Ericsson,
it rings, and when you answer, the Cisco IP Phone keeps ringing. When we
dial from the Ericsson to the Cisco IP Phone, and you answer, you get
Tone-on-hold, without pushing hold or anything. Any suggestion or maybe
configs will be appreciated.
Regards
Louis Koekemoer
Cisco IPT Systems Engineer
Converged Communications
Dimension Data (South Africa)
Tel: +27 (11) 575 6560
Fax: +27 (11) 576 6560
Cell: +27 (71) 680 8790
Email:
Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com<mailto:Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com>
Cisco Global Technology Excellence Partner of the Year 2009 | Cisco
Global Enterprise Partner of the Year 2007
Cisco Unified Communications Partner of the Year 2008 | Cisco IP
Communications Partner of the Year 2002 - 2007
Cisco Emerging Markets Theatre Partner of the Year (Middle East &
Africa) 2008 | Cisco Africa, Enterprise Partner of the Year 2009
Cisco Africa, Solution Innovation Partner of the Year 2009 | Cisco South
Africa Gold Partner of the Year 2005 ? 2007
For more information about Dimension Data, please go to
www.dimensiondata.com<http://www.dimensiondata.com/>
P Before printing this email please think about the environment
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer.htm"
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer.htm"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/e6b81
64d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:45:02 +0900
From: ??? <sehsys at innet.co.kr>
To: "Louis Koekemoer \(ZA\)" <Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
Message-ID:
<BA745B94B7AA8B44A473D71BBA87E68D01739C28 at innet-ex.innet.co.kr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Did you visit this website?
http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1471276
You can read this Q&A.
a) Can I use ELU 32 or it is possible with IPLU only ?
you can use both, but I recommend IPLU.
b) Same command structure will be used as you mentioned ?
yes.
c) Please give an idea about compression
I prefer G.711 but !. Look alsp at ASPAP PARNUM 236.
d) Any changes neeed to be made with Cisco 3845 ?
VARC d8=0 in RODAI, ADC d4=0 in RODDI, no "RROUID" parameter, and adjust
ASPAP PARNUM 60 and/or 74.
But, our ericsson Engineer is not acquainted with IPLU.
So, I can?t test this configuration.
If you can test this, let me know the result.
From: Louis Koekemoer (ZA) [mailto:Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 2:40 PM
To: ???
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
So far it looks like the only solution is a Qsig trunk, as I thought.
Problem is that the MD110 requires an aditional E1 license. Let me know
if u find a solution.
--- original message ---
From: "???" <sehsys at innet.co.kr>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
Date: 21st September 2009
Time: 2:42:44 am
Hi.
I have same problem. Have you get any solution?
If so, let me know that.
And, if I get any solution, I will give you that, too.
Good luck.
From: Aman Chugh [mailto:aman.chugh at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 9:48 PM
To: Louis Koekemoer (ZA)
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME-Ericsson IP integration
I have not done it but to start with , try looking at the following.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/ns340/ns414/ns728/networking_soluti
ons_products_genericcontent0900aecd805b561d.html
There are several links for integration with Ericsson using CUCM with
QSIG, they should give configuration insights into Ericsson.
HTH
Aman
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Louis Koekemoer (ZA)
<Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com> wrote:
I have an issue at a customer. They have a CME on one site, and then a
Ericsson MD- 110 across the WAN, connected to a 1800 router. We have one
way speech. We decide to set this up in our lab, connecting the CME to
the Ericsson via an IP card. We have network connectivity. We can ping
the Ip address on the Ip card on the Ericsson. There is a dial-peer to
the Ericsson IP Card. When we make a call to the phone on the Ericsson,
it rings, and when you answer, the Cisco IP Phone keeps ringing. When we
dial from the Ericsson to the Cisco IP Phone, and you answer, you get
Tone-on-hold, without pushing hold or anything. Any suggestion or maybe
configs will be appreciated.
Regards
Louis Koekemoer
Cisco IPT Systems Engineer
Converged Communications
Dimension Data (South Africa)
Tel: +27 (11) 575 6560
Fax: +27 (11) 576 6560
Cell: +27 (71) 680 8790
Email: Louis.Koekemoer at za.didata.com
Cisco Global Technology Excellence Partner of the Year 2009 | Cisco
Global Enterprise Partner of the Year 2007
Cisco Unified Communications Partner of the Year 2008 | Cisco IP
Communications Partner of the Year 2002 - 2007
Cisco Emerging Markets Theatre Partner of the Year (Middle East &
Africa) 2008 | Cisco Africa, Enterprise Partner of the Year 2009
Cisco Africa, Solution Innovation Partner of the Year 2009 | Cisco South
Africa Gold Partner of the Year 2005 ? 2007
For more information about Dimension Data, please go to
www.dimensiondata.com <http://www.dimensiondata.com/>
P Before printing this email please think about the environment
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer.htm"
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer.htm"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/d4cfa
71a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:15:53 -0400
From: RAWLE GORDON <ragordon at mtb.com>
To: "Aman Chugh" <aman.chugh at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI Trunk Group H323
Message-ID: <4AB74449.9876.0045.0 at mtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Aman,
The example provided by Nate VanMaren from a 3845 below, highlighted in
red, is the example I followed for creating a TrunkGroup using PRI/s.
That example works just fine. If unclear, let me know, I would be happy
to provide a copy of my scenario as well.
Tony G
>>> Aman Chugh <aman.chugh at gmail.com> 9/20/2009 8:38 AM >>>
For the archive's
Is it possible to create a trunk group for PRI (Digital) Ports. Do share
your config snippet with which you got it working.
Aman
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:47 AM, RAWLE GORDON <ragordon at mtb.com> wrote:
> Thank you guys ......
> This is really great information. Thought I was losing it, you all
were
> saying yes, I was seeing no ..... All participants are correct
including me.
> The trunk group definition can be placed on the serial interface
(Dchannel).
> I had been trying different things in an effort to get a group
programmed
> and on the controller in question that I was working with, I had
placed a
> trunk group label. That label kept the "trunkgroup" parameter from
showing
> up as an option for the interface. I just didn't realize that this
behavior
> (no option presented) would be the result.
>
> Thanks for all your help ......
> It's great to have this type of support out there in cyberspace. Have
a
> great weekend all .....
>
> Tony G
>
>
> >>> Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> 9/11/2009 12:55 PM >>>
> The command is there, it just returns an error when you enter it.
>
> J
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Nate VanMaren
> <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org> wrote:
> > On PRI I think you go into the serial interface not the voice port.
> > CHQVG001(config)#int s0/0/0:23
> > CHQVG001(config-if)#trunk-group ?
> > WORD Trunk group label
> >
> > -Nate
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 10:22 AM
> > To: Nate VanMaren
> > Cc: RAWLE GORDON; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI Trunk Group H323
> >
> > HQ(config-voiceport)#trunk-group PRI
> > Error: Failed to add non-analog port to trunk group
> > Configure in cas-custom mode or serial interface
> > mode for T1/E1 digital ports and in BRI interface
> > mode for BRI voice ports
> > HQ(config-voiceport)#
> >
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Nate VanMaren
> > <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org> wrote:
> >> These are from c3845-advipservicesk9-mz.124-11.XW3.bin, but I have
> another that is c3845-spservicesk9-mz.124-22.T1.bin, that is the same.
> >>
> >> The annoying thing about trunk groups is there is 3 different
syntaxes
> depending on the spot in ios
> >>
> >> trunk group InteCom (defines the trunk group in global)
> >> trunk-group InteCom 10 (on the voice port, or serial int)
> >> trunkgroup InteCom (on the dial peer)
> >>
> >> -Nate
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: RAWLE GORDON [mailto:ragordon at mtb.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 10:12 AM
> >> To: Jonathan Charles; Nate VanMaren
> >> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] PRI Trunk Group H323
> >>
> >> Nate,
> >> This option at the serial interface (Dchannel) for "trunk-group" is
not
> available in IOS 12.4(20)X. What IOS is associated with these snips ?
> >>
> >> TG
> >>
> >>>>> Nate VanMaren <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org> 9/11/2009 12:07 PM >>>
> >> Nah, it's just the same as analog.
> >>
> >> Here's a few snips of config and a show command.
> >>
> >> trunk group InteCom
> >> hunt-scheme sequential
> >>
> >> interface Serial0/0/0:23
> >> trunk-group InteCom 10
> >>
> >> interface Serial0/0/1:23
> >> trunk-group InteCom 11.
> >>
> >> dial-peer voice 10 pots
> >> trunkgroup InteCom
> >> description InteCom PRIs Outbound
> >> translation-profile outgoing ToInteCom
> >> destination-pattern 0#*T
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> CHQVG001#sh trunk group InteCom
> >> Trunk group: InteCom
> >> Description:
> >> trunk group label: InteCom
> >>
> >> Translation profile (Incoming):
> >> Translation profile (Outgoing):
> >>
> >> Preemption is disabled
> >>
> >> Hunt Scheme is sequential
> >> Max Calls (Incoming): NOT-SET (Any) NOT-SET (Voice)
NOT-SET
> (Data)
> >> Max Calls (Outgoing): NOT-SET (Any) NOT-SET (Voice)
NOT-SET
> (Data)
> >> Max Calls (MixTotal): NOT-SET (Any) NOT-SET (Voice)
NOT-SET
> (Data)
> >> Retries: 0
> >>
> >> Trunk Se0/0/0:23 Preference 10
> >> Member Timeslots : 1-24
> >> Total channels available : 23
> >> Data = 0, Voice = 2, Modem = 0, Pending = 0, Free =
21
> >> Trunk Se0/0/1:23 Preference 11
> >> Member Timeslots : 1-24
> >> Total channels available : 23
> >> Data = 0, Voice = 18, Modem = 0, Pending = 0, Free =
5
> >> Trunk Se0/1/0:23 Preference 12
> >> Member Timeslots : 1-24
> >> Total channels available : 23
> >> Data = 0, Voice = 20, Modem = 0, Pending = 0, Free =
3
> >> Trunk Se0/1/1:23 Preference 13
> >> Member Timeslots : 1-24
> >> Total channels available : 23
> >> Data = 0, Voice = 22, Modem = 0, Pending = 0, Free =
1
> >> Trunk Se0/2/0:23 Preference 14
> >> Member Timeslots : 1-24
> >> Total channels available : 23
> >> Data = 0, Voice = 22, Modem = 0, Pending = 0, Free =
1
> >> Trunk Se0/2/1:23 Preference 15
> >> Member Timeslots : 1-24
> >> Total channels available : 23
> >> Data = 0, Voice = 19, Modem = 0, Pending = 0, Free =
4
> >>
> >> Total calls for trunk group: Data = 0, Voice = 103, Modem =
0
> >> Pend = 0, Free = 35
> >>
> >> advertise_flag 0x00000040, capacity timer 25 sec
> tripl_config_mask 0x00000000
> >> AC_curr 29, FD_curr 80, SD_curr -40
> >>
> >> succ_curr 1397 tot_curr 1498
> >> succ_report 1397 tot_report 1498
> >> changed 1 replacement position 0
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
> >> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:51 AM
> >> To: RAWLE GORDON
> >> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI Trunk Group H323
> >>
> >> The trunk group is for analog only...
> >>
> >> You will need to duplicate your peers and create preferences for
> each....
> >>
> >> This way you don't have glare and you can order your outgoing calls
to
> >> the last PRI in the telco trunk group.
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:45 AM, RAWLE GORDON <ragordon at mtb.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi there,
> >>> I'm looking for any information on configuring more that a single
PRI,
> in a 28XX or 38XX using the H323 protocol. I'm able to locate
configuration
> for FXOs but not PRI that works anyway. My router/gateway IOS is 12.4
(20)
> T2. Is this even doable ?
> >>>
> >>> Any assistance/thoughts would be much appreciated .....
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance,
> >>> Tony Gordon
> >>> Voice Communications
> >>> M&T Bank
> >>> 410-347-6010
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ************************************
> >>> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information
that
> is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
> intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from
disclosing,
> copying, distributing or using any of the information contained in the
> transmission. If you received this communication in error, please
contact
> the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety,
whether
> electronic or hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic
personal
> information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the
> Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not
directly or
> indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other
than to
> provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
> >>> There are risks associated with the use of electronic
transmission.
> The sender of this information does not control the method of
transmittal
> or service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the
security,
> receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
> >>> ************************************
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-voip mailing list
> >>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >>
> >> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you
> are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
email and
> destroy all copies of the original message.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ************************************
> >> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information
that
> is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
> intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from
disclosing,
> copying, distributing or using any of the information contained in the
> transmission. If you received this communication in error, please
contact
> the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety,
whether
> electronic or hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic
personal
> information about consumers subject to the restrictions of the
> Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not
directly or
> indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other
than to
> provide the services for which you are receiving the information.
> >> There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.
The
> sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal
or
> service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
> receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
> >> ************************************
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ************************************
> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that
is
> intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
intended
> recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing,
copying,
> distributing or using any of the information contained in the
transmission.
> If you received this communication in error, please contact the
sender
> immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether
electronic or
> hard copy. This communication may contain nonpublic personal
information
> about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act
> and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse
or
> disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the
services
> for which you are receiving the information.
> There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.
The
> sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal
or
> service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
> receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
> ************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
************************************
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that
is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from
disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information
contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in
error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may
contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the
restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information
for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are
receiving the information.
There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The
sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
************************************
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:19:23 -0400
From: Samuel Womack <womacksamuel at gmail.com>
To: "cisco-voip at puck-nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] HP7835H2-2333 Issue
Message-ID:
<6820d5220909210619v2e03d052o1a75eaa35081607 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Just walked right into an issue and wondering how to Fix...
ERROR: did not find BIOS version file for HP7835H2-23333 in
Think this is a Media Issue? Server is an MCS7835H2-K9-UCB1 with 4gb
RAM
(2.33Ghz proc)...it's in the list for installing Unty Cnx 7.x...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/c7507
999/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BIOS_Issue.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 88168 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/c7507
999/attachment-0001.jpg>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:21:10 +1000
From: Daniel <dan.voip at danofive.id.au>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Syslog Alert Message
Message-ID:
<f861d63a0909210621g1200deffl5c7dc35b665a717e at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Guys,
Anyone seen this error / alert before?
131359 Sep 20 090059.895 UTC
%CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-NumDevRegExceeded Number of registered
devices exceeded. Maximum Devices5000 App IDCisco CallManager Cluster
IDStandAloneCluster Node ID
I can see it in the application sys log. Just wondering if its of
concern?
thanks,
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/d81ca
206/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:25:40 +1000
From: Daniel <dan.voip at danofive.id.au>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUPC users unable to authenticate
Message-ID:
<f861d63a0909210625g63b74c30hb82c9011514c74ea at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Guys,
Anyone seen an issue with only new CUPC users not able to authenticate?
We have CUCM 5.1.3 with CUPS 7.0(3) (just upgraded fron 6).
Users that were setup with CUPC before we upgraded the CUP server are ok
its
only users that are created after the server was upgraded.
They just can't log into CUPC, existing users can, new users can't.
We have the same server version in the lab (ESX) and they work fine.
Regards,
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/a2f37
3dd/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:27:31 -0400
From: STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com>
To: "Cisco Voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Cc: LINDA ROSENBLUTH <lrosenbluth at mtb.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Connection Recorded Name Replication
Message-ID: <4AB74707.9874.0039.0 at mtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have two Connection systems on 7.1.2ES16 that are using digital
networking. I have noticed that Connection is using the text to speech
translation of subscribers display name as opposed to the subscribers
recorded name to announce the sender of a received message or when the
system is verifying a address for a composed message to be sent when the
subscriber is on the other Connection system. It appears that
replication of Recorded name is not working or is this working as
designed?
Steve
************************************
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that
is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from
disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information
contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in
error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may
contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the
restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information
for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are
receiving the information.
There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The
sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/0c990
16b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:30:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Daniel <dan.voip at danofive.id.au>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Syslog Alert Message
Message-ID:
<1990557543.6471241253539854504.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
How many total devices do you have? Have you checked how many devices
are registered to each subscriber? It looks like you have more than 5000
registered to one server by the looks of it.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel" <dan.voip at danofive.id.au>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:21:10 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] Syslog Alert Message
Hi Guys,
Anyone seen this error / alert before?
131359 Sep 20 090059.895 UTC
%CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-NumDevRegExceeded Number of registered
devices exceeded. Maximum Devices5000 App IDCisco CallManager Cluster
IDStandAloneCluster Node ID
I can see it in the application sys log. Just wondering if its of
concern?
thanks,
Dan
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/33f4c
b72/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:01:17 +0200
From: Sechaba Mokoena <sechabam at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Position in Queue AND UCCX
Message-ID:
<c93177b50909210701y74d6dbc8md2316743d7bd19f4 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
Does anyone have an example of a script that uses Position in Queue for
UCCX. I've managed to find one on NetPro but I can't get the script to
announce my position in the queue. Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
Kind regards,
Sechaba Mokoena
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/22a12
e13/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:09:29 -0500
From: "Madziarczyk, Jonathan" <JMad at cityofevanston.org>
To: "Tim Smith" <thsglobal at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] BackupActivated mesages showing up on
Operations Manager
Message-ID:
<EFE351D84DCA954AB34631835C7DF9B002130CD7 at EXCHANGE3.local.cityofevanston
.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
We installed CW-LMS about a month ago, however the alerts started
showing up the same day I rebooted the GW, so it made me think it was
something related to that, when it looks like CW-LMS was monitoring it
all month, but didn't chirp until the link finally bounced....then it
wouldn't shut up :-)
Thanks guys!
________________________________
From: smithsonianwa at gmail.com [mailto:smithsonianwa at gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Tim Smith
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 5:24 PM
To: Madziarczyk, Jonathan
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] BackupActivated mesages showing up on
Operations Manager
Managed state is referring to CUOM setting for that interface. Cant get
into my CUOM this morning! But rough guestimate is below..
Go into your Service Level View, select your voice gateway, right click
it.
Either under detailed device view, or polling and thresholds, you can
list the interfaces of the device.
On the right hand side, you will see the managed state (its either true
or false) I guess according to that bug, you want to make sure you set
all your b chans to false.
Cheers,
Tim.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Madziarczyk, Jonathan
<JMad at cityofevanston.org> wrote:
So it's and MGCP gateway...how do I check "managed state"?
________________________________
From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 9:49 AM
To: Madziarczyk, Jonathan
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] BackupActivated mesages showing up on
Operations Manager
I've not touched it personally but from a colleague:
"Check out CSCsi19137, perhaps the customer has the b-channels set to a
managed state. If so then that will cause this event, the b-channels
should not be set to a managed state."
CSCsi19137 focuses on a SIP gateway but the concept of managing
b-channels applies regardless of protocol.
/Wes
On Friday, September 18, 2009 9:52:08 AM, Madziarczyk, Jonathan
<JMad at cityofevanston.org> <mailto:JMad at cityofevanston.org> wrote:
I know this is a previous post but I'm not sure my problem is the same.
I'm getting the following message about 60 times a day (CUCM
6.1.3.3000-1
Subject:
00001WN ; 10.20.20.9 ; Thu 17-Sep-2009 22:30:11 CDT ; Critical ;
BackupActivated ; Active
Message:
EVENT ID = 00001XH
ALERT ID = 00000S1
TIME = Fri 18-Sep-2009 08:38:16 CDT
STATUS = Active
SEVERITY = Critical
MANAGED OBJECT = 10.20.20.9
MANAGED OBJECT TYPE = Routers
EVENT DESCRIPTION = BackupActivated::Component=IF-10.20.20.9/106
[Se0/1/0:22];ComponentClass=Interface;ComponentEventCode=1008;Type=DS0;I
sFlapping=false;AdminStatus=UP;MaxSpeed=64000;OperStatus=UP;InterfaceCod
e=ISDNBCHANNEL;Mode=BACKUP;DuplexMode=FULLDUPLEX;LastChangedA
When I do a sho ccm-manager I see that my primary is still the
Registered server and my First Backup is labeled "Backup Ready".
I've tried physically restarting the gateway, as well as using the CUCM
interface on both the primary and the secondary to do a Reset.
The only change I've made was to add the "Display IE Delivery" in the
PRI Protocol Type Specific Information settings on one of the Ports.
Ideas?
________________________________
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/ead0e
e3d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:29:51 -0700
From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
To: Bill Simon <bills at psu.edu>
Cc: Cisco Voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco's new download Java applet
Message-ID:
<f84a38d30909210729o449269eep254e35df6d7f23a1 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
<RANT>
AS IF they didn't here us complain enough in the days of CM 4.x with
Java
script...... now they move there downloads to it. What..... do they
just
hate customers?
</RANT>
Scott
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Bill Simon <bills at psu.edu> wrote:
> For reasons unknown, but probably having to do with my Java version,
it
> failed in both Opera and Firefox. I had to use IE and I was
downloading
> from the voice stuff. I think everything is switched over to the java
> applet now.
>
>
> Erick Bergquist wrote:
>
>> I had it the other day when downloading the Firmware Update CD ISO
for
>> the IBM October Reboot issue. The progress bar on it is cisco green.
I
>> was using firefox and it was fine.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Sean Walberg <swalberg at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> I was downloading CUCM 6.1.4SU1 today and had to use it. Didn't work
in
>>> Chrome, I had to switch to IE.
>>> Sean
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> can you give us some examples of where this happens?
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>>>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G
2W1
>>>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>>>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Bill Simon" <bills at psu.edu>
>>>> To: "Cisco Voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>>>> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 4:27:32 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
>>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco's new download Java applet
>>>>
>>>> is lame.
>>>>
>>>> Why make users use a clunky and slower Java applet when browsers
are
>>>> perfectly capable of downloading files on their own?
>>>>
>>>> What is Cisco's ulterior motive?
>>>>
>>>> I'm feeling kind of tinfoil-hat today.
>>>>
>>>> Bill
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sean Walberg <sean at ertw.com> http://ertw.com/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/c8e98
0d1/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com>
Cc: LINDA ROSENBLUTH <lrosenbluth at mtb.com>, Cisco Voip
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Connection Recorded Name Replication
Message-ID:
<758079381.6506791253543665718.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I'm not on-site, so I can't test direct calling, but I just tried
sending messages between two mailboxes on two separate servers and I got
the recorded name both during addressing and listening.
I know that Wes mentioned a bug a while back with respect to TTS. You
might want to search the archives for "TTS directory handler" for a post
from me and a response from Wes.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "STEVEN CASPER" <SCASPER at mtb.com>
To: "Cisco Voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Cc: "LINDA ROSENBLUTH" <lrosenbluth at mtb.com>
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:27:31 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] Connection Recorded Name Replication
I have two Connection systems on 7.1.2ES16 that are using digital
networking. I have noticed that Connection is using the text to speech
translation of subscribers display name as opposed to the subscribers
recorded name to announce the sender of a received message or when the
system is verifying a address for a composed message to be sent when the
subscriber is on the other Connection system. It appears that
replication of Recorded name is not working or is this working as
designed?
Steve
************************************
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that
is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from
disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information
contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in
error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may
contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the
restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information
for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are
receiving the information.
There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The
sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
************************************
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/7ab26
c57/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:35:42 -0700
From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cacti again... need to monitor B channels on
a 2851
Message-ID:
<f84a38d30909210735v7dca74b4pbf68c2cf702610c5 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Jonathan--
I know it says E1's but it's worked great for our PRI T1's.
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443 Scroll to the bottom and
download the template. I don't know about CAS.
Scott
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have a customer with a 2851, running H.323 and three T1 PRIs and a
> T1-CAS. They need to monitor all in-use B-channels and all DS0s on the
> T1-CAS.
>
> Every time I look for a way to do that, all the links point to E1s on
an
> AS5300.
>
> Has anyone gotten this to work with a T1 PRI on an ISR? And if so,
how?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/dd25d
b3d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:58:48 -0700
From: Brandon Phelps <btphelps at atomicnets.com>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUBE ringback problem
Message-ID: <4AB57038.6020407 at ourgoodgarden.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Situation: PSTN originator gets no ringback on calls when they are being
transfered from Unity to ip phone.
Topology:
PSTN---Verizon---(sip)---CUBE---(h323)---CM_6---Unity
I get ringback when I initially call in, just not on transfer. The CUBE
is doing transcoding from g711 to g729 on box (using the funky telephony
services config).
I assume it is some interworking thing that someone has already
experienced. Anybody seen this?
Here is the interworking and transcoding config:
!
voice service voip
dtmf-interworking rtp-nte
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
allow-connections sip to sip
no supplementary-service h450.2
no supplementary-service h450.3
no supplementary-service sip moved-temporarily
no supplementary-service sip refer
fax protocol pass-through g711ulaw
h323
sip
bind control source-interface Loopback0
bind media source-interface Loopback0
early-offer forced
midcall-signaling passthru
sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0
sccp ccm 1.2.3.4 identifier 2 priority 2 version 6.0
sccp ccm 1.2.3.5 identifier 1 priority 1 version 6.0
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 10
associate ccm 1 priority 1
associate ccm 2 priority 2
associate profile 1 register XCODE-CUBE_DC
!
dspfarm profile 1 transcode
codec g711ulaw
codec g729r8
codec g729abr8
codec g729ar8
codec g729br8
maximum sessions 48
associate application SCCP
!
telephony-service
sdspfarm units 1
sdspfarm transcode sessions 96
sdspfarm tag 1 XCODE-CUBE_DC
max-ephones 1
max-dn 1
ip source-address 1.2.3.10 port 2000
max-conferences 12 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00
!
!
B
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:54:41 -0400
From: STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: LINDA ROSENBLUTH <lrosenbluth at mtb.com>, Cisco Voip
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Connection Recorded Name Replication
Message-ID: <4AB76980.9874.0039.0 at mtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks, I read that one - this seems to be different in that it is only
happening on a cross box situation and also effects incoming messages.
Steve
>>> Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 9/21/2009 10:34 AM >>>
I'm not on-site, so I can't test direct calling, but I just tried
sending messages between two mailboxes on two separate servers and I got
the recorded name both during addressing and listening.
I know that Wes mentioned a bug a while back with respect to TTS. You
might want to search the archives for "TTS directory handler" for a post
from me and a response from Wes.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "STEVEN CASPER" <SCASPER at mtb.com>
To: "Cisco Voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Cc: "LINDA ROSENBLUTH" <lrosenbluth at mtb.com>
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:27:31 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] Connection Recorded Name Replication
I have two Connection systems on 7.1.2ES16 that are using digital
networking. I have noticed that Connection is using the text to speech
translation of subscribers display name as opposed to the subscribers
recorded name to announce the sender of a received message or when the
system is verifying a address for a composed message to be sent when the
subscriber is on the other Connection system. It appears that
replication of Recorded name is not working or is this working as
designed?
Steve
************************************ This email may contain privileged
and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of
the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are
strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any
of the information contained in the transmission. If you received this
communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and
destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.
This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about
consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. You may not directly or indirectly reuse or
disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the
services for which you are receiving the information. There are risks
associated with the use of electronic transmission. The sender of this
information does not control the method of transmittal or service
providers an!
d assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt, or third
party interception of this transmission.
************************************
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
************************************
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that
is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
intended recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from
disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of the information
contained in the transmission. If you received this communication in
error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. This communication may
contain nonpublic personal information about consumers subject to the
restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
You may not directly or indirectly reuse or disclose such information
for any purpose other than to provide the services for which you are
receiving the information.
There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission. The
sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090921/a87f0
dac/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 71, Issue 21
******************************************
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list