[cisco-voip] Conference Solution

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Something to consider is Cisco CUWL licensing. It provides Meeting Place Express ports at a fairly good ratio. If you have to spend dollars, might as well spend it on CUWL. And, you get so much more. 

Ask your SE. 


--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neal Haas" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> 
To: "Peter Slow" <peter.slow at gmail.com>, "Matt Slaga (US)" <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com> 
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 12:16:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Conference Solution 

Up to 120 users at a time, but for sure start with 36 ports available then grow as we need too. We want to use this as training so Voice and Video, as well as your standard everyday voice conferences. We are looking at doing this as maybe two different solutions altogether. But to be honest this is still up in the air for two different solutions. If it will work in one solution that would be a plus. 

Neal Haas 

1020 S 10th St 
Fresno, CA 93702 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Peter Slow [mailto:peter.slow at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:09 AM 
To: Matt Slaga (US) 
Cc: Haas, Neal; cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Conference Solution 

More importantly, 
What size conferences are you looking at hosting? Voice or video? a 
conferencing solution of 5 to 6 participants is very different from 
one that needs to support 16 or 30 etc... 

-Peter 

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Matt Slaga (US) 
<Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com> wrote: 
> OCS 2007 R2 has pin-based dial-in conferencing, and can direct-sip integrate 
> into UCM. User accounts are tied to AD. It's not priced per port, more of 
> a per conference host user I suppose. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Haas, Neal 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 8:21 PM 
> To: 'cisco-voip voyp list' 
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Conference Solution 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all 
> 
> 
> 
> What are some third party conference solution out there that integrate with 
> Cisco. I have looked at Sonexis and was really liking what they offered, but 
> looking for something less than $1000 per port. 
> 
> 
> 
> Neal Haas 
> 
> County Of Fresno 
> 
> IT Analyst - ITSD, Communications 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________ 
> 
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain 
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated 
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you 
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and 
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly 
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting 
> it from your computer. Thank you. 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100407/a00817de/attachment.html>