[cisco-voip] Lets put together Calling party transformation pattern on UCM 7.0.1 behaviour

jeremy co jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 11 22:13:58 EDT 2010


Hi guys ,

I sent an email to this group about the wired problem I had with CngPTP and
EPNM.


How does EPNM and CngPTP configuration in multiple place relate to each
other?


EPNM could be configured in three places (considering SLRG):  TP,RP,GW

which config override the other one?



How CngPTP kick in?  as I can see if I have TP---> RP----> SLRG ---> RG and
check TP and RP EPNM then CngPTP will kick in. But checking RP EPNM  will
NOT cause CNGPTP to kick in at all.

another wired issue:

normal numbers say 911 hit TP and then RP (/+!)
globalized numbers in missed calls  say +911 RP(/+!)


funny thing is for globalized calls that hit RP directly, checking EPNM on
TP make CngPTP to  kick in or not!!!!!!



My understanding is CngPTP override should work like this.   RP---> RL--->
RG--->CngPTP  ,

so CngPTP should override all manipulation in RP,RL,RG, and if EPNM checked
on CngPTP  with predot stripping ,it should strip + from EPNM of phones just
before leaving gateway. But CngPTP in this scenario will not kick in at all.
!!!!



Anybody can shed some light on how this mess works ?


Cheers,


Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100412/7a0a3b32/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list