[cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID

[Bill Talley]

Sorry Monica.  I'm referring to calling party transformation patterns  
under the call routing menu.

Sent from a mobile device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  
Please excuse my typos.

On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:56 PM, "Monica Hardy"  
<Monica.Hardy at openwave.com> wrote:

> Thanks Bill, but I am not following.
>
>
>
> The calling party transform mask is set to 650480XXXX, it works fine  
> on this route pattern if I just call out from my desk phone, caller  
> id will be 650-480-5597.
>
>
>
> Now if I call in to the call manager to the MVA number with my cell  
> phone, which is the a RDP and then call someone my caller id shows 650-5597 
> .  It leaves off the 480 prefix from my desk number.  Isn’t the outg 
> oing call using the same route pattern? so why would this change?
>
>
>
> Also I have the box checked that says use the external mask of the  
> phone which is set to 650480XXXX.
>
>
>
> -Monica
>
>
>
> From: Bill Talley [mailto:btalley at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:06 PM
> To: Monica Hardy
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
>
>
>
> Is the calling party transform mask on your route pattern or route  
> list set to 650XXXX, or set to prefix 650?    It looks like that's  
> causing the system to combine 650 with last four digits of your cell  
> phone number.
>
> Someone else will hopefully correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe  
> you'll most likely need to use calling party transformations to  
> expand the number to ten digits.   You'll want to create a new  
> partition and a new CSS containing only that partition. Create a new  
> calling party transformation pattern that matches the caller id of  
> the cell phone, maybe [2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX and assign it to the  
> partition you just created.  Set the calling party transform mask to  
> ten X's.   Once that's done, go to the remote destination profile  
> and uncheck Use Device Pool Calling Party Transformation CSS and set  
> the Calling Party Transformation CSS to the one you just created.   
> Save changes and test.
>
> That's how I'm doing it anyway, but I haven't spent a lot time  
> researching proper usage of calling party transformations.
>
>
> It sounds like you're using a external calling party mask of  
> 650XXXX, or perhaps prefixing 650 to the calling party mask on the  
> route pattern or route list.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com 
> > wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I setup the Mobile Voice Access using the hairpinning method.   
> Everything is working except for complete caller-id.
>
>
>
> For example if I call out from my cell phone using my remote  
> destination profile and mobile voice access my
>
> caller-id will be shown as 6505597 instead of 6504805597.  I have  
> tried a bunch of settings, any idea where I should
>
> be looking at?  I was under the impress that the call would be  
> coming back out of my PSTN gw, so I don’t see why it
>
> wouldn’t work like it normally works when just calling out directly  
> from my desk phone?
>
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> CCM 7.02
>
> H323 GW 12.4.24.T3
>
>
>
> -Monica
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Monica P. Hardy
>
> Openwave
>
> Sr. Network Engineer
>
> Phone: 650-480-5597
>
> email:  monica.hardy at openwave.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/1ba2f48a/attachment.html>