[cisco-voip] Meet Me Conferences

[Kevin Dunn]

Sorry Wes the resources are not on the UCCX the script is used for
collecting conference bridge ID and PIN then sending the users to the CFB.

We only have maybe 1-2 "Meet Me" calls a month and typically less than 10
participants.  So I have always used Software bridges on CUCM.  Another
Engineer here is a devoted hardware bridge user, as to free up resources on
the PUB and SUB, but his background is with much larger networks than we run
here




On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:

> depends on your need.  In general:
>
> 1. Software bridges - G.711 only (i.e. central site ONLY deployment).
> Native on CM server, some performance impact to CM.  Network must be
> designed for RTP streams between endpoints and CM.  The cfb hosted by IPVMS
> on CM supports up to 100 participants in a single conference.
> 2. Hardware bridges - G.711 or G.729.  Use for distributed deployments.
> Number of participants allowed per conference varies by the type of DSP
> used.
> 3. Call Center Scripts(UCCX) - Not sure what you mean here. I am not aware
> of UCCX providing conferencing resources.
>
> /Wes
>
>
> On Friday, April 16, 2010 9:21:40 AM, Kevin Dunn <cheesevoice at gmail.com><cheesevoice at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>   Knowing about the multitude of cat skinning ways...
>
> When you are setting up Meet Me Conferences what is your preferred method.
> We have three camps here and I am just looking for opinions:
>
> 1.  Software bridges
> 2.  Hardware bridges
> 3.  Call Center Scripts (UCCX)
>
> What do you guys prefer?
>
> Kevin Dunn
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing listcisco-voip at puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100416/15c67b6d/attachment.html>