[cisco-voip] User Inadvertently Reaches Intercom

Erick B. erickbee at gmail.com
Mon Apr 26 20:08:54 EDT 2010


Might want to add huntstop to the last outbound dial peer also, just
to make sure the gateway stops hunting for other dial peers.


On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:31 PM, David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com> wrote:
> I never noticed those dial peers pointing to the 0/2/x ports.  Interesting,
> since NONE of the 0/2/x ports have ever been active.  Only recently did I
> turn on 0/2/0 for the paging system.  I think you're right.  My limited
> understanding then says if someone is dialing out on the PRI and an error
> occurs (for whatever reason), the 2801 will send the call out 0/2/0 as
> currently configured, which would cause the overhead page to activate.
>
> Really strange config the more I look at it!  It would make more sense to
> route the call out 0/1/x as those are connected to POTS lines.
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
> David
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I would kill dial peer 101.  If you received a failure code on your
>> pri, it would re route to your next dial peer.  You may want to adjust
>> the gatewat so it doesn't reroute on that particular error code.
>>
>> -nick
>> On Monday, April 26, 2010, David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Sorry, I was substituting # so I didn't have to type "number".  She does
>> > not dial the hash key at the end of dialing.
>> > You are correct, I could not duplicate the issue when I tried calling
>> > (the call went right through to the end user's cell phone and the end user
>> > answered).
>> >
>> > Gateway config:
>> >
>> > !! Last configuration change at 10:51:37 edt Fri Apr 23 2010
>> > ! NVRAM config last updated at 10:51:55 edt Fri Apr 23 2010
>> > !
>> > version 12.4
>> > service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime
>> > service timestamps log datetime msec localtime
>> > service password-encryption
>> > service sequence-numbers
>> > !
>> > hostname noname-2801
>> > !
>> > boot-start-marker
>> > boot system flash:c2801-spservicesk9-mz.124-22.T.bin
>> > boot-end-marker
>> > !
>> > logging message-counter syslog
>> > logging buffered 4096 informational
>> > enable secret 5 $1$rDeJ$wQbhfjKKM2KiBeHquZr51
>> > !
>> > no aaa new-model
>> > clock timezone est -5
>> > clock summer-time edt recurring
>> > network-clock-participate wic 1
>> > network-clock-select 1 T1 0/1/0
>> > dot11 syslog
>> > ip source-route
>> > !
>> > !
>> > ip cef
>> > no ipv6 cef
>> > multilink bundle-name authenticated
>> > !
>> > !
>> > isdn switch-type primary-ni
>> > !
>> > voice class codec 100
>> >  codec preference 1 g711ulaw
>> >  codec preference 2 g729br8
>> >  codec preference 3 g729r8
>> > !
>> > voice class h323 1
>> >   h225 timeout tcp establish 3
>> >  h225 display-ie ccm-compatible
>> > !
>> > voice-card 0
>> > !
>> > !
>> > archive
>> >  log config
>> >   hidekeys
>> > !
>> > !
>> > controller T1 0/1/0
>> >  pri-group timeslots 9-24
>> > !
>> > interface Vif1
>> >  no ip address
>> > !
>> > interface FastEthernet0/0
>> >  no ip address
>> >  shutdown
>> >  duplex auto
>> >  speed auto
>> > !
>> > interface FastEthernet0/1
>> >  ip address 192.168.6.229 255.255.255.0
>> >  speed 100
>> >  full-duplex
>> > !
>> > interface Serial0/1/0:23
>> >  no ip address
>> >  encapsulation hdlc
>> >  isdn switch-type primary-ni
>> >  isdn incoming-voice voice
>> >  isdn supp-service name calling
>> >  no cdp enable
>> > !
>> > ip forward-protocol nd
>> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.6.210
>> > ip http server
>> > no ip http secure-server
>> > !
>> > !
>> > snmp-server community hiddentext RO
>> > disable-eadi
>> > !
>> > control-plane
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/0/0
>> >  connection plar 2002
>> >  description 111-222-3223
>> >  caller-id enable
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/0/1
>> >  connection plar 4074
>> >  description 111-222-3333
>> >  caller-id enable
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/0/2
>> >  echo-cancel coverage 48
>> >  timing hookflash-out 500
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/0/3
>> >  echo-cancel coverage 48
>> >  timing hookflash-out 500
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/1/0:23
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/2/0
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/2/1
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/2/2
>> > !
>> > voice-port 0/2/3
>> > !
>> > no ccm-manager fax protocol cisco
>> > !
>> > no mgcp package-capability res-package
>> > no mgcp package-capability fxr-package
>> > no mgcp timer receive-rtcp
>> > mgcp fax t38 ecm
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 7 voip
>> >  preference 1
>> >  destination-pattern 1...
>> >  progress_ind setup enable 3
>> >  voice-class codec 100
>> >  voice-class h323 1
>> >  session target ipv4:192.168.6.1
>> >  incoming called-number .
>> >  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>> >  ip qos dscp cs5 media
>> >  no vad
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 8 voip
>> >  preference 1
>> >  destination-pattern 8...
>> >  progress_ind setup enable 3
>> >  voice-class codec 100
>> >  voice-class h323 1
>> >  session target ipv4:192.168.6.1
>> >  incoming called-number .
>> >  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>> >  ip qos dscp cs5 media
>> >  no vad
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 9 voip
>> >  preference 1
>> >  destination-pattern 4...
>> >  progress_ind setup enable 3
>> >  voice-class codec 100
>> >  voice-class h323 1
>> >  session target ipv4:192.168.6.1
>> >  incoming called-number .
>> >  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>> >  ip qos dscp cs5 media
>> >  no vad
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 10 voip
>> >  preference 1
>> >  destination-pattern 2...
>> >  progress_ind setup enable 3
>> >  voice-class codec 100
>> >  voice-class h323 1
>> >  session target ipv4:192.168.6.1
>> >  incoming called-number .
>> >  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>> >  ip qos dscp cs5 media
>> >  no vad
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 100 pots
>> >  preference 1
>> >  destination-pattern 9T
>> >  direct-inward-dial
>> >  port 0/1/0:23
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 101 pots
>> >  preference 2
>> >  destination-pattern 9T
>> >  port 0/2/0
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 102 pots
>> >  preference 3
>> >  destination-pattern 9T
>> >  port 0/2/1
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 911 pots
>> >  preference 1
>> >  destination-pattern 9911
>> >  port 0/0/0
>> >  prefix 911
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 913 pots
>> >  preference 4
>> >  destination-pattern 9911
>> >  direct-inward-dial
>> >  port 0/1/0:23
>> >  prefix 911
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 912 pots
>> >  preference 3
>> >  destination-pattern 9911
>> >  port 0/0/1
>> >  prefix 911
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 17 voip
>> >  preference 1
>> >  destination-pattern 6...
>> >  progress_ind setup enable 3
>> >  voice-class codec 100
>> >  voice-class h323 1
>> >  session target ipv4:192.168.6.1
>> >  incoming called-number .
>> >  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>> >  ip qos dscp cs5 media
>> >  no vad
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 11 voip
>> >  preference 1
>> >  destination-pattern 3...
>> >  progress_ind setup enable 3
>> >  voice-class codec 100
>> >  voice-class h323 1
>> >  session target ipv4:192.168.6.1
>> >  incoming called-number .
>> >  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>> >  ip qos dscp cs5 media
>> >  no vad
>> > !
>> > dial-peer voice 55 pots
>> >  description Paging for Fire
>> >  destination-pattern *34
>> >  port 0/2/0
>> >  forward-digits all
>> > !
>> > !
>> > num-exp 8581 4071
>> > num-exp 8812 1752
>> > !
>> > line con 0
>> >  password 7 045A081206
>> >  login
>> > line aux 0
>> > line vty 0 4
>> >  password 7 1416111F05
>> >  login
>> > line vty 5 15
>> >  password 7 070E225847
>> >  login
>> > !
>> > scheduler allocate 20000 1000
>> > ntp server 192.168.6.1
>> > end
>> > l
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Peter Slow <peter.slow at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > can we see the complete configuration of your gateway, please? also,
>> > did you say that you were unable to reproduce this issue when you
>> > tried calling?
>> >
>> > Also, why did your user hit the hash key at the end of dialing?
>> >
>> > -Peter
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:36 PM, David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Still getting more info from my user.  Here is what she said happened
>> >> (twice!):
>> >>
>> >> She goes to dial the cell phone person.  Presses 9 so she can have an
>> >> outbound line.  The person's cell is fairly innocuous, no 3 and 4
>> >> together,
>> >> in fact there is no 4 in the number.  Once she dials the # she gets
>> >> this
>> >> sort of automated voice that says "Per this subscriber's request this
>> >> phone
>> >> cannot accept any incoming calls.  Reference # MA95285".  She then
>> >> hears a
>> >> beep.  Thinking this is the answering machine of the cell phone, she
>> >> starts
>> >> talking, and that's when it starts going over the intercom.
>> >>
>> >> I have to believe that it is the cell phone that (perhaps since it
>> >> won't
>> >> accept any incoming calls) is being forwarded or is itself dialing a
>> >> *34
>> >> code, and we pick it up.
>> >>
>> >> I just dialed the person's cell # and the person on the other end
>> >> picked
>> >> right up.  So I didn't even get the message about "not accepting
>> >> incoming
>> >> calls".
>> >>
>> >> The crosstalk thing has some merit, but like Peter says, it would seem
>> >> like
>> >> I would be having a whole lot more complaints if that was the cause.
>> >> Plus
>> >> my user made other calls to cell phones and POTS people and none of
>> >> those
>> >> went over the intercom.  I have checked my end user's phone and under
>> >> "recently placed calls" I can see the cell # called, there are no *34's
>> >> anywhere in there.  I am going to try and do a CDR report tonight and
>> >> see if
>> >> that shows anything.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Norton, Mike <mikenorton at pwsd76.ab.ca>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Another thing... did she actually hear the person’s voicemail
>> >>> greeting? Or
>> >>> did she just hear the intercom system’s pre-announce tone, assume it
>> >>> was a
>> >>> voicemail beep, and start talking? If it was the latter, then you
>> >>> might just
>> >>> accidentally be matching the wrong route pattern somewhere.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Mike Norton
>> >>>
>> >>> I.T. Support
>> >>>
>> >>> Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
>> >>>
>> >>> Helpdesk: 780-831-3080
>> >>>
>> >>> Direct: 780-831-3076
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> >>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Zhars
>> >>> Sent: April-26-10 11:01 AM
>> >>> To: Peter Slow
>> >>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] User Inadvertently Reaches Intercom
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> What I meant was we did not hear her dialing the phone, but we heard
>> >>> her
>> >>> leaving a message for this person (since the person dialed did not
>> >>> answer).
>> >>> All I can think is the cell phone she was calling was forwarded to a
>> >>> *34
>> >>> speed-dial or something, and somehow we picked it up.
>> >>>
>> >>> It was so bizarre because when it happened, we called my user and told
>> >>> her
>> >>> what happened.  She figured the call didn't go through, so she placed
>> >>> the
>> >>> call again, and again, we heard her leaving the message over the
>> >>> intercom!
>> >>> She has since tried calling other cells and POTS and none of those
>> >>> have gone
>> >>> over the intercom.
>> >>>
>> >>> When I look at recently dialed calls, all I see are the cell # she is
>> >>> calling (which has no 3 or 4 in it!!)  I have never seen anything like
>> >>> this
>> >>> one, but like you said, CDR might be a
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>



More information about the cisco-voip mailing list