[cisco-voip] No OOBM for 7825?

[Madziarczyk, Jonathan]

I'm just shocked I guess.  Cisco seems very focused on being able to
manage their devices in just about any scenario, so much so that this
seems like a step backwards...but maybe I'm missing something.

 

Let me try from a different angle then, what is Cisco's solution for
remote hardware management?  I've had cases where I've needed to
hardboot hung servers in the middle of the night.  After all, it is
running windows :)

 

JM

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:48 PM
To: Madziarczyk, Jonathan
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] No OOBM for 7825?

 

This is nothing new, see the 7845-H4 data sheet as well.

https://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/
data_sheet_c78-478944.html

 

Cisco has never provided advanced iLO licenses for HP servers.

 

-Ryan

 

On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Madziarczyk, Jonathan wrote:





Seriously?

 

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/ps5748/ps378/d
ata_sheet_c78-513877.pdf

 

Remote management HP Integrated Lights Out (iLO) Advanced supported but
license not provided

 

The company that practically invented out of band management and pushes
it on almost every product now can't include a license with the server
to run it?  And don't even get me started on the lack of multi-interface
support on servers that have multiple interfaces.

 

Anyone got any info on how to request an iLO license from HP?

 

JM

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100203/44ea6e83/attachment.html>