[cisco-voip] Configuring first VG224: MGCP vs. SCCP configurations

[Jason Aarons (US)]

Since you never know if the device is a Analog Polycom or a modem or a fax I stick with SCCP unless they tell me they plan to do T38.  I’ve run into a lot of T38 bugs and still recommend modem-passthrough if you don’t know what your doing!

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nate VanMaren
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 10:55 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; Paul
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Configuring first VG224: MGCP vs. SCCP configurations

 

I guess I am the only one that is going to disagree.

 

I initially configured all of my gateways SCCP when that protocol was available.  It has the best telephony feature set.  However, I have found that those features aren’t used most of the time.

 

The biggest use of analog in my mind is faxing.  It seems like the future of faxing is T.38.  While SCCP supports Cisco proprietary NSE based T.38, try and integrate that with even Cisco’s OEMed fax server.

 

So I recommend MGCP for at least your fax ports on your VG224 so that you can run protocol based T.38.

 

-Nate

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 6:12 PM
To: Paul
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Configuring first VG224: MGCP vs. SCCP configurations

 

I agree. If you are only using them for phones, go for SCCP. Even for modems and faxes, you can use modem/fax passthrough and things work well.

Check the list archives for information about how MGCP is a better option for alarm systems that convey contact information.

P.S. if you are deploying a few, consider the four-pack. it's cheaper

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul" <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>
To: "Rob Leetun" <rleetun at bouldercounty.org>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2010 7:45:54 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Configuring first VG224: MGCP vs. SCCP configurations

SCCP is superior as a control protocol for VG224s as it not only makes configuration of the ports extremely easy, it also enables a lot more features that are otherwise unavailable if MGCP is used as a control protocol.

SCCP essentially makes the 24 FXS ports into phones you can configure just like any other IP phone within CCM.




________________________________
From: "Leetun, Rob" <rleetun at bouldercounty.org>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, January 6, 2010 3:42:45 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] Configuring first VG224: MGCP vs. SCCP configurations


Currently we have many old VG248 dinosaurs in our shop.  So
we started the configuration of our first VG224.  The question has been raised
as to use either MGCP or SCCP.  Which one is the best and why?
 
Thanks.
 
Rob


      
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

 



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100107/a88522ec/attachment.html>