[cisco-voip] moving unified servers to DR site

Matthew Saskin msaskin at gmail.com
Fri Jan 22 12:29:11 EST 2010


Regardless of what your consultants say, please bear in mind the Cisco
recommendations are also guidelines for them to support you.  If you run
into HA issues with unity or IPCC and you go to get TAC support, there's a
good chance you're not going to get full support out of Cisco if the overall
system design doesn't meet requirements.

Matthew Saskin
msaskin at gmail.com
203-253-9571

July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin


On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Scott Kee <SKee at cmsstl.com> wrote:

>  Jason:  Got it..
>
> Thank you for the information.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jason Shearer [mailto:jshearer at amedisys.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2010 9:25 AM
> *To:* Scott Kee; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* RE: moving unified servers to DR site
>
>
>
> We do it but have more than 10Mbs.  The most important thing here is
> latency and QoS.  Monitor the bandwidth between the servers and adjust
> service policies accordingly.
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Kee
> *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2010 9:19 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] moving unified servers to DR site
>
>
>
> We are trying to move our secondary HA Cisco unified servers to the Sun
> Guard DR site.
>
>
>
> We are going to install 2nd CUCM subscriber server at the DR site and move
> Secondary Unity and CRS server to the DR site.  Leave Primary Unity and CRS
> server at the Corporate Data Center.
>
>
>
> Question is this: We are going to have ATT 10Mbps MPLS circuit to the Sun
> Guard.  Per Cisco document you at least have to have 100Mbps connection to
> the High Availability Servers but per our consultant people, 10Mbps is
> sufficient.  I think this design will work fine but want to hear second
> opinion.
>
>
>
> Has anyone done this before… Do you see any issue with this design?
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *** NOTICE--The attached communication contains privileged and confidential
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, DO NOT read, copy, or
> disseminate this communication. Non-intended recipients are hereby placed on
> notice that any unauthorized disclosure, duplication, distribution, or
> taking of any action in reliance on the contents of these materials is
> expressly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please delete this information in its entirety and contact the Amedisys
> Privacy Hotline at 1-866-518-6684. Also, please immediately notify the
> sender via e-mail that you have received this communication in error. ***
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100122/f462ef51/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list