[cisco-voip] moving unified servers to DR site

[Bill Talley]

Cisco doesn't presently support CRS HA servers separated geographically.

UCM and Unity are both supported in HA configurations,  depending on  
minimum bandwidth guidelines and/or response times.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Matthew Saskin <msaskin at gmail.com> wrote:

> Regardless of what your consultants say, please bear in mind the  
> Cisco recommendations are also guidelines for them to support you.   
> If you run into HA issues with unity or IPCC and you go to get TAC  
> support, there's a good chance you're not going to get full support  
> out of Cisco if the overall system design doesn't meet requirements.
>
> Matthew Saskin
> msaskin at gmail.com
> 203-253-9571
>
> July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
> Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
> http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Scott Kee <SKee at cmsstl.com> wrote:
> Jason:  Got it..
>
> Thank you for the information.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jason Shearer [mailto:jshearer at amedisys.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 9:25 AM
> To: Scott Kee; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: moving unified servers to DR site
>
>
>
> We do it but have more than 10Mbs.  The most important thing here is  
> latency and QoS.  Monitor the bandwidth between the servers and  
> adjust service policies accordingly.
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Kee
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 9:19 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] moving unified servers to DR site
>
>
>
> We are trying to move our secondary HA Cisco unified servers to the  
> Sun Guard DR site.
>
>
>
> We are going to install 2nd CUCM subscriber server at the DR site  
> and move Secondary Unity and CRS server to the DR site.  Leave  
> Primary Unity and CRS server at the Corporate Data Center.
>
>
>
> Question is this: We are going to have ATT 10Mbps MPLS circuit to  
> the Sun Guard.  Per Cisco document you at least have to have 100Mbps  
> connection to the High Availability Servers but per our consultant  
> people, 10Mbps is sufficient.  I think this design will work fine  
> but want to hear second opinion.
>
>
>
> Has anyone done this before… Do you see any issue with this design?
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *** NOTICE--The attached communication contains privileged and  
> confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, DO  
> NOT read, copy, or disseminate this communication. Non-intended  
> recipients are hereby placed on notice that any unauthorized  
> disclosure, duplication, distribution, or taking of any action in  
> reliance on the contents of these materials is expressly prohibited.  
> If you have received this communication in error, please delete this  
> information in its entirety and contact the Amedisys Privacy Hotline  
> at 1-866-518-6684. Also, please immediately notify the sender via e- 
> mail that you have received this communication in error. ***
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100122/103879dc/attachment.html>