[cisco-voip] Standby publisher

Bill bill at hitechconnection.net
Thu Jul 1 11:23:34 EDT 2010


I think we are using product and hardware instead of design. 

 

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Saskin
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:02 AM
To: Andrius Kislas
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Standby publisher

 

If the physical hardware (and therefore MAC) address changes, you'll need to
engage TAC to re-host your license.

This begs the question - why would it take a week of downtime?  Even if you
do a publisher rebuild and restore, it should take 24 hours top and that's
including getting new hardware from Cisco provided you're in a moderately
serviced area.  If you're not in a moderately serviced area, I have two
questions.  1) why is the callmanager publisher not in an area where proper
hardware replacement coverage can be guaranteed and/or 2) why is an on-site
spare not there for a cluster servicing 30K+ phones.  Just some thoughts...

Matthew Saskin
msaskin at gmail.com
203-253-9571

July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin



On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Andrius Kislas <andrius-conf at kislas.lt>
wrote:

Why would I need to involve TAC? I haven't done publisher restoration
process, but reading Desister Recovery doc I haven't noticed any notes
ragarding MAC address change. So I am guessing restoration procedure
from backups will take care of new MAC, won't it?

Also I do agree this is a already redundant system from call processing
perspective, but imagine 60K mega cluster and not being able to make any
changes for a week (that's without publisher). So I am adressing exactly
this situation.

Andrius


On 2010.07.01 16:59, Eric Butcher wrote:
> The cost / benefit analysis of this is a pretty hard sell, but if you're
looking to squeeze that last bit of redundancy out of an already very
redundant phone system...  It can be done.  Not as simple as plugging it in,
powering it up, and loading licenses though.  There would need to be a tac
case involved anyway.
>
>
> Eric Butcher
> Cisco Unified Communications Engineer
> CDW Professional Services
> 11711 N Meridian, Ste 225
> Carmel, IN  46032
> C 317.569.4282 - IP Phone
>   765.744.1458 - Mobile
>   eric.butcher at cdw.com
> www.cdw.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 9:28 AM
> To: Bill
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Standby publisher
>
> No you can't.  All database changes can only be made to the publisher.
This changes a bit in 6.x where the "user facing features" are written on
each node, and replicated out to other nodes in realtime.  This is what lets
you set and clear CFA with the pub down in later versions.
>
> See
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/6_0_1/cucm-rel_
note-601a.html#wp44437 for specfics.
>
> Having a standby publisher installed and ready for restore is not a bad
idea but you will be restricted by licensing (P1 TAC SR with the licensing
team should get you rehosted pretty quickly I hope).  The only thing to
worry about wrt to IP address is if the pub is specified in System->Server
by IP address this would cause problems after the restore.   This could be
avoided simply by changing the IP address to match the failed publisher
before starting the restore.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Bill wrote:
>
> Also, at least in the 4.x days, you can still make changes to the
subscriber if the publisher is down.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed Elnagar
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:43 AM
> To: Andrius Kislas
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Standby publisher
>
> What about the license? The license relates to the MAC address of the
server??
>
>  Best Regards;
>   Ahmed Elnagar
>   Senior Network PS Engineer
>   Mob: +2019-0016211
>  CCIE#24697 (Voice)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrius Kislas
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 1:17 PM
> To: Cisco Voip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Standby publisher
>
> Hi All.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but when the publisher fails the biggest impact
we have is not being able to change configuration. In large environments
this might be serious impact.
>
> My question is - does anybody use a standby/cold publisher that has the
only task - sit and wait until the primary publisher fails? This standby
published would ba standalone (not a member of existing cluster), would have
different IP address (in the same subnet) and the same name as existing
publisher, would have no licenses uploaded and would be kept in the same
version as primary publisher. During primary publisher failure we would need
to change IP address and perform disaster recovery. This would save us some
time that we would typiacly need to get new server, install new publisher,
upgrade it and finally perform recovery.
>
> Does it sound fine or are there any caveats for such approach?
>
> Regards,
> Andrius
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is
confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received
this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator
immediately.
> The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is
strictly forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or
consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this
message by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being
passed on. Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those
of Raya.If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the
original message.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100701/aa515c23/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list