[cisco-voip] blf on 8.0.2c

Dennis Heim Dennis.Heim at cdw.com
Tue Jul 6 13:43:35 EDT 2010


I didn't think the gen 1 phones supported BLF functionality.

Dennis Heim
Network Voice Engineer
CDW  Advanced Technology Services
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
Carmel, IN  46032

317.569.4255 Office
317.569.4201 Fax
317.694.6070 Cell
dennis.heim at cdw.com<mailto:dennis.heim at cdw.com>
cdw.com/content/solutions/unified-communications/<http://www.cdw.com/content/solutions/unified-communications/>


From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Goldsmith
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 1:35 PM
To: voip puck
Subject: [cisco-voip] blf on 8.0.2c

I just opened a TAC case on an interesting thing that seems like a bug.  I upgraded our 7.1.3 CUCM last week to 8.0.2c, and after testing for several hours, everything seemed perfect.

Fast forward to today, I get asked to add a  few new phones with BLF's programmed.  The phones are 7960 and program fine with the extension, however, the BLF's are empty, the Label doesn't show, let alone the BLF symbol on the display.  Editting an existing phone that has BLF's act normally.

Doing a super copy of the working phone (one on my desk) doesn't resolve the issue, still no BLF's, but the Line 1 copies just fine.

Very bizarre behavior.  A few quick searches through the release notes on 8.0.2 and 8.0.2c didn't show anything specific to this issue, however there are two BLF caveats, but they have to do with empty partitions, and I'm using non-empty partitions with these phones and BLFs.

Anyone else run into this issue?
Charles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100706/949396f9/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list