[cisco-voip] SRST with MGCP on a VG224

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

That was on my list of things to test, but never got around to it. Theoretically, you would do exactly as you said, the MGCP port would failover to H323 and use dialpeers to talk to a gateway. 

I'm thinking though, it might be better to make them H323 from the start and use gatekeepers. 



--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim at cdw.com> 
To: "cisco-voip" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:20:18 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [cisco-voip] SRST with MGCP on a VG224 




Has anyone done this? 



I see that the application global alternate default is available. Does this mean I would just need to put dial-peer points to the gateway with the local trunks on it so my fax machines could dial-out? 



Everything I have found online talks about setting up SCCP on a VG224 with SRST. 



Dennis Heim 
Network Voice Engineer 
CDW Advanced Technology Services 
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225 
Carmel, IN 46032 

317.569.4255 Office 
317.569.4201 Fax 
317.694.6070 Cell 

dennis.heim at cdw.com 
cdw.com/content/solutions/unified-communications/ 




_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100715/420dc34c/attachment.html>