[cisco-voip] Differences between MGCP / H323 in handling unknown (not configured) extension numbers in callmanager

[Scott Voll]

I like to use a XXXX wild card pattern that I shot over to VM that says this
number is not in use or  forward them to the Operator.

Scott

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Ki Wi <kiwi.voice at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Group,
> According to my memory there's some differences as per topic
>
> Something like when a voice gateway using MGCP , incoming call to when the
> unknown extension number in callmanager. Caller will get a message to say
> that the number is not in used. (by telco)
>
> While using H323, the call is passed to callmanager. The call will keep
> ringing.
>
> Does anyone experience it before? Is there anyway to fix the problem?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100719/54d65678/attachment.html>