[cisco-voip] Differences between MGCP / H323 in handling unknown (not configured) extension numbers in callmanager

[Ki Wi]

Is there any other way? I'm aware that I can use route pattern to make some
announcement by blocking the pattern.

Is it some sort of limitation with H323?

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:

> I like to use a XXXX wild card pattern that I shot over to VM that says
> this number is not in use or  forward them to the Operator.
>
> Scott
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Ki Wi <kiwi.voice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Group,
>> According to my memory there's some differences as per topic
>>
>> Something like when a voice gateway using MGCP , incoming call to when the
>> unknown extension number in callmanager. Caller will get a message to say
>> that the number is not in used. (by telco)
>>
>> While using H323, the call is passed to callmanager. The call will keep
>> ringing.
>>
>> Does anyone experience it before? Is there anyway to fix the problem?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100720/edf7c8af/attachment.html>